SOUTH BEND, Ind. -- Not again.The clock really did read "0:00" this time. Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen trudged slowly toward his teammates who were congregating in the northwest corner of Notre Dame Stadium. Clausen, still wearing his helmet, walked alone and allowed himself a singular, soul-cleansing, emphatic expletive.
After what he had just been through, the junior quarterback can be forgiven that audible.
Not again. Seriously? Another USC-Notre Dame contest that featured a last-minute, outcome-in-the-balance drive toward the south end zone? A fourth-and-long conversion on that drive? A final play after the clock has already struck 0:00? It was the Bizarro World version of the 2005 game at Notre Dame Stadium with one meaningful exception: USC still won, 34-27. USC always wins. That's just what the Trojans do.
"It's just a heartbreaker, period," Clausen said later, "whether you come back from seven points or however many points we did today (20 ... almost). It's just a tough loss."
Once again, as they have done too many times this decade, the Irish played just well enough to break their hearts-and those of their faithful. Four years ago it came down to one fateful play. On Saturday it came down to three: a trio of plays, beginning with 0:09 on the scoreboard, from the USC 4-yard line. Clausen, the nation's leader in passing efficiency, with three shots at glory from four yards out.
"If you would have told me before the game, 'You can have the ball on the five (four) yard-line at the end of the game with a chance to tie or win," Irish coach Charlie Weis said, "I probably would have taken that."
If you had told him that with 13:33 to play and the Irish down 34-14, you bet your aspirin he would have taken it. At that point it looked as if the buzzards in the press box might be correct, that Weis might be coaching his final game in this rivalry.
More than a few of the national columnists who descended upon South Bend brought with them both a laptop and a noose. This game might be, in their minds, a potential coup de grace game for Notre Dame's fifth-year coach. And when Trojan tailback Joe McKnight scored from one yard out to make it 34-14 with 13:33 to play, you could feel the gallows door opening. The leads would be worded differently, but each would be some variation of "Flat-lined against a blue-gray sky, Charlie Weis' career at Notre Dame came to an end today."
Instead, Weis' team fought back. And that's what this is: Weis' team.

Certainly in those final 13½ minutes the Fighting Irish not only proved that they are a far more competitive team than they have been of late. They also demonstrated that, where this coach is concerned, they're not quitters. Still, what must sting for Weis, who now must concern himself more with having the patience of Job as opposed to simply having a job, is that the Irish have now gone four entire games-plus seven seconds-without holding a lead even for one play against their most celebrated rival.
That and the fact that USC, when it really matters, always makes a play. And the Irish do not.
The Irish did make big plays and plenty of them. A fake field-goal in the first quarter, a pass from backup punter and baseball pitcher Eric Maust to Robby Parris, awoke the audience and gained 25 yards down to the USC 2. One play later, Robert Hughes punched it in, Notre Dame's first touchdown against USC in 135 minutes of regulation stretching back to 2006.
Golden Tate was his brilliant self once more, hauling in a 45-yard touchdown pass on a go route while taking a shot in the chops from All-American safety/terminator Taylor Mays. Defensive end John Ryan had a key sack to halt USC's final drive, while Gary Gray made the interception that allowed the Irish to believe that just maybe it would be worth investing their hope in a victory this day. Parris, on fourth-and-10, made a gutsy catch while nearly being decapitated by Mays.
In the end, however, USC made more. Or at least enough. Three times, giving one of the nation's best passers a try from 12 feet away, the Trojans, playing thousands of miles east and dozens of degrees south of their home, made the stop. And Notre Dame, once again, came within a moment of the type of cathartic release that they and their fans have been deprived of for, well, 16 years now, since the 1993 win against No. 1 Florida State.Touchdown Jesus stares down at Notre Dame Stadium from the Hesburgh Library, but perhaps when USC visits they should change the mosaic to Moses. Because today, as happened four years earlier, the Irish almost, but not quite, made it to the promised land.
"It's not good enough for us," said center Eric Olsen when asked if the Irish could at least be satisfied with a moral victory. On the other hand there were two dozen or so recruits in Notre Dame Stadium today, and they nearly witnessed the Irish erase a 20-point fourth-quarter deficit against the stingiest defense in the land. What did they see?
"I hope that they see that we're definitely making a comeback to what Notre Dame once was," said Olsen, a senior who will never be able to say that he beat USC. "I hope they see how much it crushed us to lose."




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-17-2009 @ 11:59PM
Sean said...
If Weis is truly able to turn this thing around and do the 'Return to Glory' thing, then maybe this is a turning point. Maybe it is just one good game. All I can say is that I agree that this is finally WEIS' TEAM. they fight and claw and go down to the end, 5 games in a row. You didnt see this the last two years and now you do. OF course, this means nothing if they lose to BC next week, even if it is on the final play.
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 12:20AM
Bobby Dodd said...
Gee Whiz, keep drinking he kool aid John. The Flaccid Irish lost to a ranked team with a winning record. Big Shock.
No way did ND deserve a top 25 ranking based upon their weak as piss schedule.
ND and fat Charlie are an overrated joke.
Wake me up when ND beats a ranked opponent. How long has it been again????
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 12:43AM
ginodp said...
I have been an USC fan since Jon Arnett ran wild at the Coliseum in the 1950's. But for the first time I have to say I am ashamed to call myself a Trojan fan. This latest collection of Pete Carroll's is nothing but a group of classless, stupid, arrogant thugs. Instead of enjoying this victory I sit here disgusted with these talented jerks. Eight dead ball personal fouls and/or unsportsmanlike penalties. They seem to care more about strutting and hurting their opponents than they do about winning. They never learn, like in the Washington game a few weeks ago, when their defensive lineman made a tackle for a loss he was celebrating like he just won the Superbowl even though the Huskies were about to kick the short, game winning field goal on the very next play. Like the Miami teams of the ‘90's I can see why they are hated by most college football fans. USC used to win with class in the days of McKay and Robinson and although I love that Carroll has made USC a winner again, but if this is the cost then I'm not sure I want it anymore.
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 1:46AM
jessemolson48 said...
how many years does he need 40 years lol
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 2:24AM
ray gerbi said...
gnodp...I am also a diehard USC fan...but, like you I was disgusted at the lack of control Carroll has over this group of talented but cluless kids! For the first time in my LIFE, I was rooting for ND to score! I cannot stomach the lack of sportsmanship on this group of Trojans.I gues we were both spoiled by the type of teams McKay amd Robinson gave us... win or lose, they did it with class!
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 2:54AM
stconk85 said...
Why do Notre Dame fans think you have to return to glory? In that matter, you might include USC, Texas, Alabama, and the Nebraskas of the world? You all keep talking about getting back on top. Get over it you spoiled fans. Take a page out of some good Catholic Theology, and start accepting the world as it is, and not as you want it! I want a championship settle on the field and not by a bunch of over opinionated sports writers. That is not going to happen, because the controversy spurs profits in college football.
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 4:51AM
Sam said...
Hey confused USC fans. Did you not see the Notre Dame defensive player celebrating after his tackle? Did you not see Golden Tate celebrating after his first TD? Even the biased ND TV announcers commented about the no call. Notre Dame celebrates and taunts every game. Rarely do they get penalties. It is not about USC playing without class. Most colleges are the same. Penn State is the only team I have watched that does not taunt. JoePa does not permit it.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 10:38PM
kiowa391 said...
Amen.....
10-18-2009 @ 5:24AM
Steve said...
Here is an idea. All colleges in a conference should stop scheduling games against Notre Dame. Notre Dame likes being an independent and not subscribing to the advanced concept of sharing( not being in a conference). Let them play with themselves (oops) against themselves....on National TV...NBC...the Notre Dame Football network. Divide the team in half and let them go at it. A Notre Dame team would win every Saturday and all would be happy.
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 6:50AM
Seth said...
How soon we forget. USC lost to Washington. Washinton has 4 losses this year. What is
impressive is for a true freshman QB to throw for 380 yards against Notre Dame,
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 9:46AM
DP said...
Yes, finally someone else that realizes USC doesn't belong in the championship discussion (as of now).
USC lost, yet again...as usual, to a team they had no business losing to. They lost to Wash who now has four losses. Say all you want about dropping Texas and Florida, but who deserves those spots then???? I'm waiting......
Last I checked Florida and Texas are still undefeated. Texas' offense was horrible yesterday but ya'll keep forgetting to mention that the defense was rock solid (OU had negative 16 yds rushing). Just wait for the offense to click and then look out. Oh yea, defense wins championships right?!?!?
Reply
10-18-2009 @ 8:29PM
DVMEPL said...
why do people who dont like notre dame bother to come on this page and comment?
Reply