ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- The University of New Mexico athletic department has turned the incident involving head coach Mike Locksley and his assistant coach J.B. Gerald over to the university's human resources department, athletic director Paul Krebs said Tuesday.Gerald filed a police report Sept. 20, claiming that Locksley punched him in the face and split his lip following an argument during a staff meeting. News of the altercation began seeping out slowly the following day, but it became an avalanche this week as the school opened up about the incident.
Locksley has not shied away and he has admitted his mistake to his team, Gerald, Krebs and the media. Locksley and Krebs dispute the fact Gerald was punched in the face, citing no witness accounts. Still, they realize it all looks bad on the first-time head coach, his program and the university.
Locksley, who is in his first season as head coach of the Lobos, was given a letter of reprimand for his part in the altercation. Gerald, who has been on paid leave, has shown no interest in pressing charges.
But with the heat the athletic department continues to take for its perceived slap on the wrist to Locksley, the department decided to ask the HR department to investigate the incident. Depending on what the department finds in its investigation, Locksley could face suspension or dismissal. It is likely, however, that it will be determined that the athletic department handled things appropriately.
To this point, it has been the issue that just won't go away. Krebs has been upfront about his disappointment in the decision his coach made to put his hands on another coach.
"I wish I had chance to do it all over again," Locksley told FanHouse while sitting in his office Tuesday night. "I would definitely make a different decision."
The Lobos are 0-4 heading into a non-conference game Saturday at Texas Tech.
But Locksley's issues are greater than wins and losses. Since being hired last December, he has now been involved in two off-the-field incidents that have brought undo spotlight on the athletic department. In May a 54-year-old former office worker filed a sexual harassment/age discrimination complaint with the EEOC against the 39-year-old coach.
That case is still pending and is heading into mediation. But on the heels of that comes the altercation with Gerald. Combine those incidents with the fact the Lobos haven't played well this season and it has spelled trouble early in Locksley's tenure.
But both Locksley and Krebs take issue with the lumping of the sexual harassment/age discrimination claim together with the latest incident.
"I take full responsibility as the leader of the program for the distraction that I've caused," Locksley said. "It's unfair that people like to piggyback it to an earlier incident that is working itself through the process. For us, we've put it behind us as a program and we're just moving forward and the best thing I know to do is to focus on the football because when it's ultimately said and done, the bottom line is I've got to find ways to win ballgames."Krebs certainly agrees.
"I think it's compounded by the fact we are 0-4. If we were 3-1, I think people would look at it much differently," he said. "The bottom line is he was wrong, but has it threatened my trust in his leadership? I still think he is a very good football coach, he's surrounded himself with a very outstanding staff. They are recruiting like heck, they are coaching these guys up. I think the future is bright. We've got to weather this year and turn the page."
Making it difficult right now is the latest issue hanging over the program. Gerald hasn't said whether he will return to the program or not. But when FanHouse reached him Tuesday night, he indicated that he was considering a return for his players' sake.
Gerald, 27, is in his first full-time assistant coaching role after Locksley brought him over from Illinois. Locksley was Illinois' offensive coordinator when he hired Gerald as his graduate assistant after he had spent time as graduate assistant at Penn State.
Gerald declined to talk to FanHouse further on Tuesday night.
"There is a history there, I think a love and respect for one another," Krebs said. "So this has been a very emotional issue on both sides.
"It's unfortunate that it happened, it's happened, we're trying to deal with it and be respectful to all parties and continue to manage a football team and recognize that coach Locksley's career -- I don't want to say is at stake in this instance -- but there has already been enough turmoil in his tenure as a head coach that we've got to put all of this noise behind us and begin about rebuilding our football program."




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-30-2009 @ 3:09AM
lola espanola said...
Coach Locksley should be terminated.If he is allowed to continue is to say violence in the workplace is okay.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 8:49PM
ruready4success said...
Everyone's got it all wrong. J.B. Gerald flung his face into the path of Mike Lockley's fist. Not Coach Lockley's fault at all. I'm just sayin'...
Cheers!
Jito
(Take a ride above the clouds on one of these beauties http://fa.by/f73aeb)
9-30-2009 @ 3:57AM
David S. said...
If the two men involved in the altercation are willing to let it go, so should the university. Good lord, no one was seriously hurt here. Talk about blowing things out of proportion. The sexual harrassment/age discrimination suit is a different matter, but it is not yet resolved.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 8:49AM
imedajinsokt said...
Hello? Does anybody honestly think that the assistant coach was "willing to let it go" without any intimidation, express or implied? If he presses charges, he's a snitch (the football culture and the thug culture aren't that far apart), he'll be semi-blackballed in the profession, he won't be able to keep his current job if the present coach stays, he won't be able to work with a new coach because he'll be the snitch he drove the other coach out of his job, etc., etc. The assistant is in the same position as the woman whose boyfriend beats her up and she's "unwilling" to press charges because she knows she has to live with the guy still around. lola espanola has it right: Since when can a boss punch a subordinate in the face and not lose his job?
9-30-2009 @ 9:47AM
whirple said...
we don't know the details. was there provocation? who verbalized inappropiately? etc Let the two men work it out. if the head coach punched the ass't. needlessly, then give the other guy his retaliatory free shot: let him take a free shot at Locksley anyplace he chooses. maybe a gut punch would make everything all equal. if Locksley admits he was wrong, he shouldn't have a problem letting the other guy take a free shot on him.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 10:54AM
Dave said...
Let me get this straight, a 4-0 coach cannot hit anybody, but if you are 3-1 it might be ok????
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 11:44AM
cappybw said...
One might make the assumption that striking someone in the face is a crime in New Mexico. Clearly this would not be tolerated if it was a student. It certainly cannot be tolerated from an adult that among other things should be a role model. The remedy of putting a letter in his file almost seems like an attempt at humor.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 12:19PM
Koch said...
Why investigate the incident. Even if locksley did hit the coach nothing will be done to him. The fear of al the mouth sharpton parading around the school crying racism will prevent that.
Reply
10-04-2009 @ 3:22PM
ppalamo40 said...
Disgusting, physically assaulting an employee and receiving only a verbal reprimand with a letter in the personnel file. What’s even more sickening is after Locksley apologized, he uses the lame excuses; “the stress of coaching and that it wasn’t necessarily a punch.” Spoken like a man with little or no character or integrity. Many of the players and colleagues have witnessed Locksley’s foul-mouthed behavior; that he poured-out on anyone of his choosing; labeling him unfair and a bully.
Krebs, tried to pawn the assault off by saying “it’s not unusual for college football coaches to have “heated discussions” during staff meetings.” Does that include assault and battery? He hired Locksley after last season and expressed his continued support for Coach Locksley. Krebs also said that “I do not believe that this is a reflection of his character.” Liar! What is even more alarming is Krebs admitted “he wasn't intimately familiar with the university's personnel rules and defended his decision to reprimand Locksley.” Why didn’t you get a copy of the UNM polices! Something smells PUTRID! It appears that Lockley and Krebs should start checking out the Job Listings, because they both need to be FIRED!!!!!!!
Reply
10-04-2009 @ 3:59PM
williamjones11 said...
Embarrassing!! Assault/battery and sexual harassment/age discrimination charges; it’s time for President Schmidley and Krebs to admit this was a bad hire. Not to mention the poor piss job he is doing coaching, (0-5) the players nor the staff don’t like or respect him. Why, because he doesn’t give them any respect with his unfair tactics.
Reply