
LOS ANGELES -- A national columnist created a stir before the start of this year's college football season when he said USC's football program has "underachieved" under coach Pete Carroll.
Underachieved?
For thin-skinned USC supporters, the statement struck a nerve. They pointed to the Trojans' back-to-back national championships in 2003 and 2004 and the program's streak of seven consecutive Pac-10 championships and seven in a row BCS bowl game appearances.
Definitely the type of numbers most football programs can only dream about.
But for USC, the standard for winning is much higher than most.
Since the Trojans began their current remarkable run, which took off in Carroll's second season as coach in 2002, they expect to win every game and when they don't, it's always college football's biggest story of the week.
"To be honest, every loss that we've had sticks out," said USC offensive lineman Jeff Byers, who has been a part of the Trojans' program for six years due to a medical redshirt year. "Every [defeat] that I've been a part of is still clear in my mind. You just remember those losses."
Which is easy to do when you consider that the Trojans have won 81 of their last 88 games with the combined total of points in the losses adding up to just 26. And, in each one of those defeats, USC had a chance to win or send the game into overtime with its final possession.
"All of the losses are tough," Byers said. "I can't pick out one that's worse than another. Losing never feels good, especially playing here. All you can do is remember that any game you can be beat. Even if you go 11-0, that doesn't mean anything if you don't go 12-0 playing for USC. "
Here's a breakdown of USC's last seven defeats: In 2003, the Trojans lost by three points in triple overtime at California; by three points in the final 19 seconds to Texas in the 2006 Rose Bowl BCS Championship game, by two points on a failed two-point conversion pass with seven seconds to play at Oregon State and by four points at UCLA when John David Booty was intercepted on USC's final drive in 2006, by one point at home to Stanford and a touchdown at Oregon in 2007, and by six points at Oregon State in 2008.
If you noticed, six of those defeats came against teams from the Pac-10, which is rarely regarded as a powerhouse conference around the country.
It's also the main source behind USC's "underachievers" tag, because if not for conference play stumbles, the Trojans could easily be playing for their sixth national championship in seven years this season.
"Although some people don't think so, but we play in a tough conference," Byers said. "Our conference plays us really really tough. In any game, you can get beat because there really aren't any pushovers. There's always one or two teams in the conference that struggle every year but they don't stay bad for long. The conference is pretty solid from front to back and that shows.
"I just know that when we go out of conference, we've shown that we can play with anybody. But in conference, we always have some tough games. Part of it is that our opponents really know us well and usually are ready to play their best game against us."
The Trojans can certainly count on that this week when they travel north to face Washington, which is coached by former USC offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian.
A matchup Carroll lectured about to his team minutes after the Trojans' come-from-behind 18-15 victory over Ohio State last week in Columbus.
"We see teams every week with a big emotional victory, and then the next week they don't look like the same football team, and that happens in sports," Carroll said. "We went right at that in the locker room [following USC's win over the Buckeyes] to make sure we set the tempo. We had a lot of fun with it in the game, and then we went right into what's at hand because I don't want to miss this opportunity to play really well again, and come back and get a win."
A year ago, USC had 12 days off after beating Ohio State, 35-3, at the Coliseum and then lost at Oregon State, 27-21. After the game, Carroll blamed himself for not having the Trojans ready to play.
Latest College Football Images
In this photo taken on Sept. 12, 2009, Ohio State right tackle Jim Cordle is shown during an NCAA college football game against Southern California in Columbus Ohio. Cordle will miss the next three to four weeks with an ankle injury. Coach Jim Tressel disclosed the injury on Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009. (AP Photo/Terry Gilliam)
AP
In this photo taken on Saturday, Sept. 5, 2009, Jordan Shipley prepares to hold an extra point attempt for a Texas kicker during fourth quarter action in an NCAA college football victory in Austin, Texas. A fake field goal in last week's victory in Wyoming failed. As the holder on field goals, Shipley took the snap and tried to run for the first down. Needing one yard, he got none. (AP Photo/Harry Cabluck)
AP
In this photo taken on Sept. 5, 2009, Southern California running back Joe McKnight dives over the goal line to score a touchdown against San Jose State during the first half of an NCAA college football game in Los Angeles. McKnight finally had a performance befitting his star potential last week against Ohio State, yet the junior is still just one man in a rotating cast of ball-carriers for the No. 3 Trojans. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)
AP
In this photo taken on Sept. 5, 2009, Southern California running back Joe McKnight carries the ball against San Jose State during the first half of an NCAA college football game in Los Angeles. McKnight finally had a performance befitting his star potential last week against Ohio State, yet the junior is still just one man in a rotating cast of ball-carriers for the No. 3 Trojans. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)
AP
In this photo taken on Saturday, Sept. 5, 2009, Texas safety Blake Gideon keeps his mouthpiece at the ready as he stands in sidelines during fourth quarter action in an NCAA college football game in Austin, Texas. The Longhorns host Texas Tech Saturday night. In last season's loss to Texas Tech, Gideon dropped a sure interception that likely would have given the Longhorns the victory. (AP Photo/Harry Cabluck)
AP
In this photo taken Saturday, Sept. 5, 2009, Texas safety Earl Thomas is shown during pregame warmups before his team's NCAA college football game in Austin, Texas. The Longhorns are set to host Texas Tech Saturday night, Sept. 19, 2009. (AP Photo/Harry Cabluck)
AP
Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno gestures as he answers a question during his weekly news conference on Tuesday, Sept. 15, 2009 in State College, Pa. Penn State plays Temple at home on Saturday. (AP Photo/Pat Little)
AP
Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno answers a question during his weekly news conference on Tuesday, Sept. 15, 2009 in State College, Pa. Penn State plays Temple at home on Saturday. (AP Photo/Pat Little)
AP
Oklahoma State football coach Mike Gundy speaks during a news conference in Stillwater, Okla., Monday, Sept. 14, 2009. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki)
AP
Wisconsin head football coach Bret Bielema screams during the second half of an NCAA football game Saturday, Sept. 12, 2009, in Madison, Wis. It took two overtimes for a flu-ravaged Wisconsin team to defeat Fresno State. As the Badgers look toward Wofford this week, Bielema gives an update on how his team is handling the flu outbreak that affected 40 players last week. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)
AP
A mistake Carroll has worked hard to avoid this week.
"You can tell that he's learned from past experiences," Byers said about Carroll, who has a 90-15 record in nine seasons at USC. "Guys have a tendency to get lackadaisical and then lose that approach to prepare for every game like it's a championship game. Coach Carroll's philosophy is to prepare Monday through Friday like you are playing the best team in the world. You have to be ready to execute."
Said Carroll: "It really has to do with the respect that we bring to the preparation process that makes the difference. We got to make sure that that's there."
Coaching against Sarkisian and Washington's defensive coordinator Nick Holt, who worked as an assistant at USC for six seasons, only adds to Carroll's motivation for Saturday's game.
"They know a lot about us. We know a lot about them," Carroll said about facing his former USC assistants. "I don't think anybody has an advantage ...
"It's fun from our vantage point because it has to be very detailed and intricate subtleties of the adjustments that we'll do and they'll do. It's fun to see it unfold for us and how they do and how we adapt to all of that. There is a gamesmanship that just because of the background and the knowledge it's different than other match ups. But that doesn't make the game different ... So I look forward to this, and can't wait to get it started, and it's a big deal."
And Carroll knows that it will be even a bigger deal if history repeats and the Trojans lose to another Pac-10 team.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-17-2009 @ 1:18PM
wizadx said...
This article is ridiculous. USC is held to a higher standard than other schools when it comes to the BCS based on the perception that the PAC-10 is weaker than the Big-12 and SEC.
It is what it is. Forcing 18-22 year old kids to be up for every game in order to make the MNC game is ridiculous for any college team. If there were a champion last year, it should have been Utah.
I dare Florida to come into the Pac-10 and play USC's sched along with it's OOC sched, not a couple of directional schools and travel somewhere hostile to go undefetaed year in year out just to make the MNC game.
USC is forced to go undefeated to make the MNC game while Florida and Texas are allowed one loss. I think the Pac-10 bowl record of 5-0 last year put that myth to rest.
Let me remind you that Florida lost to Ole Miss AT HOME while USC went into a hostile enviornment in Corvalis and lost by 3. I have no doubt that USC would have given Florida a game. Give Pete a mnonth to prepare and he will not lose by more than a TD if he loses at all.
The root of the problem is the BCS. Set up a 8 team playoff and then we can discuss if USC has underachieved. Until then, Pete Carroll's team will be a joy to watch whether or not they make the "Championship Game" and definitely have not underachieved.
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 3:19PM
millerengl said...
Spot on. I live in the East and the lack of recognition to the West Coast is astounding year after year..SEC is good but their teams would not fare 1/2 as well if they played the PAC 10 year after year...
Also look at the professional ranks and the amount of Pac 10 players that are the top pros in relation to the SEC....
9-17-2009 @ 4:14PM
GregB said...
NO ONE has higher standards that Pete C. The USC losses during his tenure are so close, the games could have gone either way and the great majority of the (15?) losses in 9 seasons are on the road!
6-1 in BCS games, 2 NC's and 3 Heisman Trophy winners isn't enough? (And the one loss was to a GREAT Texas team that scored in the last 1 minute and we lost by 4 points...) Give me a break!!!
There is no other Program in the Country that wouldn't take USC's record under Pete C (ask the Alumni at Michigan and ND or Alabama - 3 of the top Programs of Alltime!) and the truth would be demonstrated easily.
My goodness, don't these "I need a story every hour" news hacks have ANYTHING else they can find and complain about??? (What an IDIOT!!!)
Fight On!
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 5:12PM
greg said...
One has to admit, Pete purchases the best players that money can buy.
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 6:40PM
dlfrench1843 said...
ALL in conferance games are tough. Just ask any sucessful school from ANY conferance. It is not at all surprising that USC manages to lose to an overachieving "in conferance" school. Look at the sec, big 10, big 12 -they all have suffered losses that "ruined" their seasons because thay were playing in their backyard where there insn't any fear and lots of animosity. But to correct the writer USC does not have back to back BCS championships, in fact, if the NCAA ever finishes its "investigations" of the football and basketball programs, USC will have many less victories.
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 6:52PM
wizadx said...
Yes they are all tough, but why is USC held to a higher standard when losing to Oregon State than when Florida or Texas loses one conference game as well..... that's what I thought... there isn't one.
USC may not have back to back BCS championships, but they do have back to back National Championships, and that is all that matters.
Also, USC will not have any less victories after the NCAA finisher its investigation. Maybe in basketball, but not in football.
9-17-2009 @ 8:39PM
ashleigh said...
To dlfrench -- You are mistaken... USC does, indeed, have back-to-back National Championships, as a matter of fact, they were going for a 3-peat when they lost to Texas by a hair...
Reply
9-18-2009 @ 12:37AM
cjgdnight said...
Pete Caroll and Spurrier are really just average coaches at the end of the day.
Proof is when they leave their talent ladened college powerhouse teams and go to the NFL where everyone runs just as fast as everyone else, neither coach does very well.
USC wins because they have the best talent in the country at every position. On every snap, they have an physical mismatch SOMEWHERE on the field, so they do well.... put this guy in a situation where it is about X and O's and motivation and all of a sudden he doesn't do as well.
Reply
9-18-2009 @ 2:32AM
ashleigh said...
That doesn't even make sense, cignight... That's like saying the best coach and the best team in High School Football, isn't really very good at all, because if you pit the coaches or the players against a college team, they wouldn't do very well... No kidding... Ya think? Why are you comparing 18 year old college kids with 27 year old grown men with pro experience to determine their worth on the field???
As to coaching in the NFL, well, NFL coaches don't have the freedom or latitude that Pete Carroll clearly has at USC... He has FAR more control at USC than he ever did in the Pro's, which is why he wins so much at USC & not so much in the Pro's, so you're really comparing not even apples to oranges, but apples to celery! They're not comparable because they are not even close to being the same thing...
Like those 15 year old high school kids having to compete with college kids, there is no comparison, so why dog a USC team simply because they wouldn't shine in the NFL right this minute??? (& by the way, they eventually DO shine in the NFL, and are often 1st round draft picks)...
So grow up, and fight fair, as your comparisons stink and have no merit...
Reply
9-20-2009 @ 8:56PM
cjgdnight said...
Ashleigh,
YOU ARE AN IMBECILE if you think talent doesn't carry the day in college football. How do you think these great teams stay great year after year after year? The fact is that top 5 recruiting classes produce top teams in 3 years. The top programs get the best players and stay at the top.
NFL coaches have ultimate say in what style of offense and defense they run. The difference is that now the DBs all run 4.4 40's and the receivers can't blow by them like they do in college... therefore you actually have to coach and can't rely on McKnight who runs a 4.2 40 to run by a linbacker who runs a 4.6 40.
Why doesn't Spurrier win at SC after being there 7 years... I'll help you stupid girl, he cannot recruit the talent he needs to win... the X and O's are as good as when he was at FLA, but the talent level (read physical mismatches) just isn't there.
Hint for you ASHLEIGH, High school coaches don't recruit players that much... you kinda get what you get that grows in your area of the world... so coaching at the high school level is harder to produce winner after winner.
Your argument was not well thought out... you should stick to sports you understand... football is certainly not one of them.