
I was in the hospital when Charles Woodson beat out Peyton Manning to win the 1997 Heisman Trophy. It was my freshman year of college, and I was still fighting the battles of a pre-adolescent; my tonsils had just been removed. I was in surgery when the ceremony date arrived and I didn't find out the result until the next morning. My dad called the hospital from Nashville, and I was still a bit woozy from the surgery.
"Well," he said, "Charles Woodson won it."
I didn't believe him, but my throat was so swollen I couldn't talk to ask more questions. Eventually, I scrawled out a message on a napkin that my mom could relay to my dad.
"How," I scribbled, "did Charles Woodson win?"
I wanted the numbers, the tally of Manning's defeat. My mom scrunched up her face as she looked at my message.
"Who," she asked, "is Charles Woodson?"
Back then, Tennessee fans who could talk, myself not included, reacted with indignation. "He's the guy," we might have said, "who stole the Heisman from Peyton Manning."
Twelve years later, the anger over Charles Woodson's Heisman victory still burns as it did in December of 1997. The people of my home state, Tennessee, still cringe when Woodson's name comes up in conversation. I married a Michigan grad, of all people, and the only thing I ask my wife is that she refrain from uttering his name in our house. Generally she complies. Unless, that is, she wants to win an argument.
"Oh, yeah," she'll say, smirking a bit, "Charles Woodson."
His name is still fingernails on a chalkboard.
On a few occasions, Woodson has come to the Volunteer state to play against the Tennessee Titans in Nashville. When his name is announced, boos rain forth in fury. Mention him on my radio show in Nashville, and 12 years later, it's guaranteed to lead to jam-packed lines. The anger hasn't receded, it's just moved beneath the surface, percolating, the Tennessee football boil that cannot be lanced.
Woodson is the Voldemort of Tennessee athletics, he who cannot be named.
In that same December, 1997, Eric Berry was a nine-year-old defensive back. His father, James, played for the Vols, and Eric hoped Manning, a fellow Volunteer, would take the trophy over Woodson, the man who played his position.
"I was rooting for Manning," Berry says. "When he lost, I was like, man ..."
Already, Berry was tearing up the local youth football fields in Georgia, and his climb didn't stall as he aged. By his senior season, Rivals tabbed him a five-star player, the No. 3 overall player in the class of 2007. Berry did not disappoint, starting every game of his freshman year. In his third game, Berry intercepted Tim Tebow and returned the pick 96 yards for a touchdown. It was the first interception of his career, and, as he streaked down Florida's field, juking Tebow out of his cape in the process, a Tennessee legend was born.
Eventually, Berry picked off four more passes that season for another 106 yards in return yardage. Along the way, he burnished his reputation as a devastating hitter, and Vols fans began to whisper about just how good Berry could be.
Meanwhile, the Woodson resentment did not fade.
Partly, this is the result of Heisman voters spurning the Volunteers again and again. No Vol has ever won the Heisman, yet three times a player has finished second.
First, Hank Lauricella came in second in 1951. Then Johnny Majors lost to Notre Dame's Paul Hornung in 1956. Hornung is still the only Heisman winner to play for a losing team -- the Irish went 2-8 -- and many in the state believe it was the Notre Dame name that garnered Hornung the vote over Majors. Well into the 1990s my grandfather, a former Vol football player, would gripe over the vote.
"Johnny Majors should have won, sonny boy," my grandfather would say, "he should have won."
In 1993, quarterback Heath Shuler, then a junior, finished second to Charlie Ward. Vol fans hoped Shuler would return for his senior season and take home Tennessee's first Heisman. But Shuler bolted for the NFL, opening the door for a heralded freshman quarterback named Peyton to take the field.
And so, after fifth-year senior starting quarterback Jerry Colquitt blew out his knee on the first series of the season and backup Todd Helton was himself later injured, Manning took over the starting role in October and proceeded to turn the Tennessee record book into his personal memoir. For many Tennessee fans, Manning was the chosen one, the player who would end the Heisman futility.
When Manning returned for his senior season, we celebrated like Davy Crockett had been resurrected from the grave. At long last, our time was here.
Berry's sophomore season more than lived up to the promise of his freshman year. In 2008, Berry had 72 tackles, 8.5 tackles-for-loss, and three sacks. Berry improved on his freshman totals, even though he played two fewer games, with seven interceptions and 265 return yards. Two of those interceptions were returned for touchdowns. Berry also worked his way onto the offensive side of scrimmage last year, rushing seven times for 34 yards, caught one pass for three yards and returned two kicks for a total of 28 yards.
By the end of the season, Berry was just 15 yards from setting an all-time record for interception return yardage. After two seasons of football, Berry has 12 interceptions that he's returned for 487 yards, an average of 41 return yards per interception.
Forty-one.
Curious as to how Berry's 2008 campaign compared with Woodson's 1997 statistics, I went back and compared them. In 1997, Woodson had eight interceptions, returned for a grand total of seven yards (with no touchdowns), 47 tackles, five tackles-for-loss and one sack. On offense, he had 12 receptions for 238 yards and two touchdowns. Woodson returned 36 punts for a very pedestrian average of 8.1 yards. One of those went for a touchdown. But it came against Ohio State and helped to buttress the opinion that Woodson was an electric punt returner. In fact, he wasn't, but that one play received so much airtime that it made fans and media believe he was better than he actually was.
Woodson's Michigan defense finished ranked second in the nation, Tennessee finished tied for third.
Woodson had one more total touchdown than Berry, one more interception, and returned punts -- one of which went for a touchdown. Berry finished with 25 more tackles, 3.5 more tackles-for-loss, two more sacks, and, most significantly, 258 more return yards on those interceptions. Even if you add in the 238 receiving yards Woodson recorded in 2007, Berry still outgained Woodson by 20 yards simply by returning his picks. Plus, and this may be telling, in 2008, Berry was a sophomore, and in 1997 Woodson was a junior.You can construct a very sound argument that Berry's 2008 campaign was every bit the equal of Woodson's 1997 Heisman campaign. Statistics, of course, don't tell the whole story. Woodson's team went on to win a share of the national title and Berry's went 5-7, but team performance isn't the final arbiter for an individual reward, or at least shouldn't be. Berry may not have deserved the Heisman based on his team performance, but was he deserving of at least one single Heisman vote? One paltry, off-the-cuff vote on one single ballot?
Not according to Heisman voters.
In 1997, Manning's Vols went 11-1 in the regular season and won the SEC. Manning finished his regular season with a 39-5 career record as starting quarterback. He lost to Florida three times, Alabama once, and Memphis once. That was it. Manning lost the Heisman to Woodson and appeared stunned. So were many in the media and in UT's sports information department.
This past fall, as I researched my new book, a member of the Knoxville media approached me and pointed at UT's long-time sports information director as he stood on the side of the field watching practice. "That's Bud Ford," the media member said, "and he still hasn't forgiven himself for Peyton Manning losing the Heisman."
In reality, there was nothing Ford or anyone else could have done. Woodson's nascent campaign caught flight at just the right moment, ESPN played up his candidacy, the Hypesman was born, and Woodson posed alongside the most storied individual trophy in all of sports.
Tennessee seethed.
Then ESPN's College Gameday host Chris Fowler poured gasoline on the controversy, referring to the uproar in the state of Tennessee as a "trailer-park frenzy." He was right about the last word, wrong about the first two. It wasn't just trailer parks where Tennessee fans were angry, it was every single household in the state that bled orange, from the Governor's mansion on down, from neurosurgeons to out-of-work janitors.
How unique was the surge in Woodson's candidacy? Leave aside the fact that he was the first defensive player to win the Heisman, or that the Heisman was but a pipe dream for Woodson leading into the 1997 season. Not one single defensive player has even been invited to New York since Woodson's victory.
Not one.
After the Heisman loss, Manning carried his Volunteers into a potential national championship game in the Fiesta Bowl. Woodson's Michigan Wolverines faced off against Ryan Leaf's Washington State Cougars in the Rose Bowl. If Leaf and Washington State won, Tennessee and Nebraska would face off for a national championship game. If Michigan won, then Nebraska could win a title and finish undefeated; Tennessee could not.
Michigan won, Nebraska won, and the titles were split.
Manning was drafted first overall by the Indianapolis Colts and Woodson went third to the Oakland Raiders.
Now, as the 2009 season dawns, Volunteer fans look to No. 14 and wonder, is this karmic justice, a homegrown Volunteer defensive back who is better than Woodson? And if, be still our orange hearts, Berry is better in this, his junior season, can he too catch Heisman fire, repeat history, surge ahead of more established players at the quarterback position, and help to assuage the anger still held by Vols fans?
Can Eric Berry bury our Heisman anger once and for all?
Latest College Football Images
Tennessee running back Montario Hardesty is tackled during football practice Saturday, Aug. 8 2009 in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)
AP
Tennessee defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin runs to the sideline at Neyland Stadium during practice Saturday, Aug. 8 2009 in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)
AP
Tennessee safety Eric Berry waits between plays during football practice Saturday, Aug. 8 2009 in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)
AP
Nebraska's Zac Lee throws during football practice Saturday Aug 8, 2009 in Lincoln, Neb. (AP Photo/Dave Weaver)
AP
Tennessee coach Lane Kiffin, center, talks with quarterback Jonathan Crompton during NCAA college football practice Saturday, Aug. 8 2009 in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)
AP
University of Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson runs during practice in Ann Arbor, Mich., Monday, Aug. 10, 2009. Freshman quarterbacks Tate Forcier and Robinson get their first shot to outshine returning starter Nick Sheridan at Michigan's first practice after losing a school-record nine games in Rich Rodriguez's debut season with college football's winningest program. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
AP
University of Michigan quarterback Tate Forcier (5) throws during practice in Ann Arbor, Mich., Monday, Aug. 10, 2009. The freshman from San Diego is competing for the starting position with junior Nick Sheridan. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
AP
University of Michigan quarterback Nick Sheridan (8) runs during practice in Ann Arbor, Mich., Monday, Aug. 10, 2009. Sheridan split snaps last season with Steven Threet, one of several players to leave Michigan after Rodriguez arrived, but lost valuable experience in the spring because with a broken leg. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
AP
The University of Michigan's indoor practice facility is seen in Ann Arbor, Mich., Monday, Aug. 10, 2009. Michigan assistant athletic director Scott Draper says the school's new indoor football facility is the tallest of its kind in the country. Draper provided a tour Monday of the 104,000-plus square foot building that is as high as 85 feet high from artificial turf to the nearest obstruction as the Wolverines went through their first practice on adjacent fields outdoors. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
AP
University of Michigan running back Brandon Minor (4) runs during drills in practice in Ann Arbor, Mich., Monday, Aug. 10, 2009. Minor averaged nearly five yards a carry in the 2008 season. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
AP
The University of Tennessee thinks so. It's why they've launched the first Heisman campaign for any player since Manning. Billboards adorn the state, a huge blow-up of Berry's jersey, a Heisman Web site -- Berry4Heisman.com -- all offered in the fervent hope that Berry can be a latter day Woodson.
So much has changed in the last 12 years of college football. The Internet has taken over as the meeting place for college football fans, YouTube has joined ESPN as the locus for fan hype, and Berry has a Twitter page with over 3,000 followers where he ruminates upon seeing kids out at the mall dressed in his jersey and whether they'll recognize him. "This guy is wearing my jersey in the mall. I wonder if he knows it's me. Lol"
But what hasn't changed is the quest for Heisman redemption among Tennessee football fans.
Twelve years ago my mom asked me, "Who's Charles Woodson?" and my throat was so swollen I couldn't even respond. Twelve years later, I finally can.
Who's Charles Woodson?
He's the guy who isn't as good as Eric Berry.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-10-2009 @ 8:39PM
Brandon said...
wow dude...cry me a river
Reply
8-10-2009 @ 10:17PM
ivo610 said...
your such a homer
Reply
8-10-2009 @ 10:22PM
J Schmidt said...
Charles Woodsons presence on the field elevated the teams ability to a play at a higher level. He won the Heisman Trophy because he transcended the sport. Can Eric Berry bring that eliment to the table?
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 9:40AM
Melissa said...
Learn to spell before posting.
8-10-2009 @ 10:43PM
vu1995 said...
Dude, do you ever write about anything besides SEC/Tennessee football? Charles Woodson is a Hall of Fame cornerback. Eric Berry played on a 5-7 team last year, and won't sniff national attention on par with what Woodson garnered in 1997. Why? Because he doesn't play for a top 25 team and he doesn't play both sides of the ball. Tennessee football is simply not that riveting, Clay. You can shoe-horn the stories into place, but they're still a second-tier SEC program, and they'll probably lose to Vandy this year :)
Reply
8-10-2009 @ 10:59PM
Kevin said...
Back then the Big Ten was still a power running conference. Not a true justification but perhaps a reason for Woodson's "lower stats."
Reply
8-10-2009 @ 11:18PM
greatqb44 said...
First of all #3 Charles Woodson/Hall of Fame?...College ya...Pro..uh no
Second of all to answer Clay's question...Hell no
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 3:02AM
ren said...
I was born/raised in Tennessee, but I'm a Michigan fan/alum first. And UTK was shoved down my throat, definitely, as a teenager--especially when it came time to pick a college, which was around the same time UTK won their last national title and about a year or so after Woodson beat Manning. So I support some Tennessee football, despite hating the SEC now out of obligation to the Big Ten, and I'd like to think that I have some objective, logical ability as far as the great Woodson vs Manning debate.
Um...I have no idea why Tennessee fans think they/Manning were wronged. It truly amazes me that so many Vols are still seething about this. And if we've learned nothing else through watching college football, it's that one game can change everything. So what if Woodson came into the 97 season not even thought about as far as the Heisman? Um, Texas beat Oklahoma last season, which come December no one seemed to care about...and at the beginning of the season, everyone seemed to be yelling that Chase Daniel would win the Heisman, if not Tim Tebow or maybe even Javon Ringer. Bradford was not the leader for that.
It makes more sense to me that if you have a player who makes great plays on offense, defense and special teams...that kinda beats making great plays just as a QB. Simply put, Woodson could do it all. That's one reason I don't think Berry has a shot. It would be cool, but Woodson got help from playing on more than just defense--which makes if funny to me that so many people call him a "defensive" player, like he didn't do other things--and he was also on an undefeated team. Tennessee is not going to be anywhere near undefeated, and your team's record DOES matter, in addition to what positions you play. You're a lawyer, and I have a law degree...but I think we both know college football doesn't conform to the logic to which we're both accustomed. Berry might very well deserve the Heisman at the end of the season just based on how HE plays, but for various reasons related to college football's way of doing things he's unlikely to get it.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 9:07AM
bsmith9215 said...
You said it.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 9:37AM
alavol said...
If Woodson was so much better than Manning I believe the pro teams would have been the first to recognize it. What did they do? They picked Manning as the first round draft pick and Woodson didn't even go 2nd. When it comes to money, winning a popularity contest like the Heisman don't cut it. Money talks and BS walks! Manning went on to rewrite the pro record books and Woodson has done what? I didn't even know he was still playing.
Reply
8-11-2009 @ 6:45PM
Todd said...
Still won the Heisman AND the National Championship.......how about manning?
8-11-2009 @ 6:59PM
will said...
i bet your pretty angry that stafford didn't win the heisman last year.
"money talks and bs walks". While aware of the phrase I certainly don't see how it pertains to this in the...
wait, are you being an internet tough guy?
stay of the internets please
8-13-2009 @ 10:21PM
teldar said...
The only problem with that is teams pick players they NEED. Not necessarily just the top QB. Some teams NEED a QB. Some don't. If you run a team and you have John Elway in his prime as your QB, are you going to draft (insert ANY QB drafter since) just because it's a QB? Give me a break.
8-11-2009 @ 11:11AM
tnvol said...
Clay, as a UT fan you should know that we have had four players finish second in the Heisman. The first was not Majors, but Hank Lauricella in 1951, the year UT was consensus national champion.
Reply
8-12-2009 @ 10:45PM
rraider1007 said...
You mentioned Woodson's 8 interceptions, but you didn't mention this. Opponents threw to his side of the field 10 times. Total. The entire season.
Also, you mentioned interception returns for touchdowns, which is probably the dumbest stat I've ever heard used in my life. My response is that it's tough to return it for a touchdown when you do this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk5u20AuXkE.
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 11:26AM
Steve R said...
alavol - NFL teams don't just rank college players and pick from the top down. They have positions of need and pick accordingly.
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 12:48PM
FTENN said...
Dude, Woodson played big in big games. The 1-handed INT against MSU. The punt return and interception in the endzone against OSU. What did Manning do against his biggest rivals? He lost to Florida 3 times. Dudes a choker and didn't deserve the Heisman. Woodson deserved to win, Manning got second, get over it.
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 1:47PM
U_R_Clueless said...
Wow, Clay. You have some pretty serious issues. How about writing your next article about how the Union stole the Civil War from Confederacy.
The South shall rise again! Nathan Bedford Forrest for Heisman!!!
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 1:50PM
MIRuss said...
Dude,
LET IT GO.....If you and the rest of your Tennessee bretheren are still hungover about what happened in 1997, you have some real problems. Woodson won that award by making circus catches AND participating on offense. He played in the Big 10 and eliminated half of the field. He didn't have lots of return yards because TEAMS DIDN'T THROW TO HIM. And when they did, they paid the price. Yes, Manning was a great player, but he didn't have a great season...Sorry. Woodson was the most exciting player to watch that year, period.
Reply
8-13-2009 @ 1:50PM
lwmeier14 said...
Peyton Manning was an outstanding college football player. He may in fact be one of the best college players of the last few decades. Sadly for him--and much more so, for Clay Travis apparently--he was not more outstanding than Charles Woodson in 1997.
There are a few things Travis seems to blend into his treatment of this subject that must be corrected.
1. The Heisman is not a lifetime achievement award for NCAA play. Manning's career record is lovely, but only one season counts toward any Heisman.
2. The Heisman is not an award for pro achievement, or draft status. Everyone knows this--no, Mario Williams shouldn't have won, Tebow won't have to return his award, etc. If evaluations of draft talent render a thumbs up or thumbs down on Heisman choices than it's safe to say that 99% of Heisman winners wrongly won the award.
3. The Heisman is won, not lost. In other words, you do not deserve the Heisman until someone can make a great case against you. I constantly hear the following argument: Manning lost solely because he couldn't beat Florida. Not winning the most important game certainly didn't help, but this is a Manning-centric view that ignores the truth that Woodson WON the Heisman. If weepy Mr. Travis had watched the Michigan games from 1997 he would not feel so wronged. Woodson was dominating, carried the team on his back, made some of the most impressively athletic plays in NCAA history, and came up huge in the biggest games. It's not about Manning failing. Woodson turned in one of the greatest seasons we will ever see. It is Manning's bad luck that it was in 1997.
Two final points:
1. Stats do not determine the Heisman. Do we really want a QB from T. Tech or Houston raising the trophy each year?
2. Woodson did not win because of media "hype." Any suggestion that Peyton Manning has been harmed by poor treatment from them media is laughable.
Clay, Manning is a wonderful player. He was great in 1997. He was great throughout his career. He has been a great pro. He did not win the Heisman. Move on with your life.
Reply