Big Ten Media Days are now under way in Chicago, hot on the heels of the goat auction that was SEC Media Days last week. This is sort of like chasing a shot of Glenfiddich with a can of room temperature Diet Squirt, but we press on regardless. The Big Ten's fortunes are muddled and murky, but the conference still matters, and not just in the Midwest, either.Thus, it behooves us to look at some of the bigger questions surrounding
Is there a national title contender in the Big Ten this season? The media has already established the 2009 Big Ten season as a two-horse race between Ohio State and Penn State. This is probably accurate. Whoever wins the conference will almost certainly play in Pasadena ... on January 1, that is. Barring a complete meltdown in the SEC and Big 12, it's difficult to see the coaches and the Harris Poll voters giving either team a shot at the title. Ohio State has simply gacked once too often, and Penn State fared poorly in last season's Rose Bowl against the toughest competition they faced all year. Either team would have to run the table and hope that nobody gets out of the SEC and the Big 12 without at least two losses. Then it might happen. Maybe.
Okay, how about a Heisman candidate? If there is one, it will be a situation like Iowa's Brad Banks in 2002, where a player simply comes out of nowhere and puts up numbers that can't be ignored. Ohio State's Terrelle Pryor would be the most likely person to do so, but it's a crowded field of quarterbacks out there. I mean, there are two guys playing this season who already have Heisman Trophies. If Pryor accounts for 40-plus touchdowns, throws fewer than 10 interceptions, leads OSU to the national title, and foils a major terrorist plot, he might get 30 percent as much attention as Tim Tebow and Sam Bradford.
At any rate, I don't even think Pryor is the best offensive player in the conference. Illinois' Arrelious Benn (pictured right) is, but wide receivers aren't eligible for the Heisman any more, apparently.Gee, Mark, you sound optimistic. So what are the stories we should follow in the Big Ten this season? I can see four things you should definitely keep an eye on.
First, there's how the conference performs in its big non-conference games. Not that there will be many of these, but when the rest of the college football world has been going all Harlem Globetrotters on your conference in the postseason, you need to prove that the teams in your conference can't just beat up on each other.
Ohio State-USC Sept. 12 is the game everybody has circled, with few outside of Columbus expecting the Buckeyes to prevail even though the game is in the Horseshoe. A "success" here might mean keeping the game within two touchdowns. Illinois could make a statement in Week 1 with a victory over a regrouping Missouri team, and the Iowa-Arizona game Sept. 19 could prove to be more of a dogfight than anyone thinks. Meanwhile, the Michigan-Western Michigan season opener will let us know just how far Rich Rodriguez might go in his second season.
That, by the way, is the second thing you should watch for. Michigan has been all but written off by everyone, with a few pundits predicting an outside shot that they might go to the Motor City Bowl or something. RichRod took West Virginia from a 3-8 team his first season to a 9-4 team in his second. Before you say "that was in the Big East," please remember that Miami and Virginia Tech were also in the Big East in 2002, and they were at least as good then as Ohio State and Penn State are now.
The third thing to watch for is that venerable Big Ten institution, the sort-of-good team that skips one or two of the conference's best teams. That team this year would be Michigan State. The Spartans don't play Ohio State and get Penn State in East Lansing for the season closer in the battle for the trophy the Big Ten found in a dumpster behind the Salvation Army store. (Behold, the Land Grant Trophy!) It's entirely possible Sparty comes into that game undefeated, ranked in the top 10, and the subject of much bawling from the fans of whatever two-loss SEC team just fell out of the top 10.
Of course, Northwestern could find themselves in a similar situation, as they also don't play the Buckeyes, and Penn State is coming to Evanston as well. The Spartans and Wildcats square off Oct. 17 in East Lansing. You might want to make a note of that.

The last thing to watch for will be the performance of two coaches who probably should be on the hot seat but aren't. Illinois' Ron Zook just signed a one-year extension and thus is now more expensive to get rid of. He can recruit national title-level talent. Just ask Urban Meyer. Zook has not shown that he can win consistently with that talent, and his top assistant, Mike Locksley, is now the head coach at New Mexico. Another subpar season might hurt his vaunted recruiting classes, and if Juice Williams goes from "all-everything high school quarterback" to "undrafted free agent," which is a distinct possibility, that's going to hurt the Zooker in the recruiting zoo as well.Likewise, Wisconsin's Bret Bielema started circling the drain last year, though Barry Alvarez is still pleased with his protégé's performance. The Badgers' schedule is very friendly, with a trip to Columbus looming as the only Insta-Loss. Eight regular season wins plus a bowl victory would probably keep the Mad Town fans from spending the offseason crying into their Spotted Cows.
So there is a quick and dirty overview of the Big Ten's big picture. This remains a conference with a lot to prove to college football fans outside the Midwest, but there are enough compelling stories and enough good-to-very-good teams to keep things interesting. There may not be a lot of surprises in the Big Ten this season, but the football will be better than you think.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-27-2009 @ 3:53PM
snappleosky said...
Isn't Iowa in this conference? A team with a good running back (Jewel Hampton), a quarterback who improved a lot last year (Ricky Stanzi), an excellent coach (Kirk Ferentz) and a defense that is always tough? A team that upset Penn State last year? You don't even mention Iowa? What a joke!
Reply
7-27-2009 @ 4:00PM
Mark Hasty said...
I am a lifelong Iowa fan and former season ticket holder. I would dearly love to write that Iowa has a great shot at winning the conference and shocking the nation, but their conference schedule is murderous. That being said, if Iowa should run the table, they're one of the five best teams in the nation.
7-27-2009 @ 4:07PM
Mr.G said...
It seems very popular to bash this conference and Mark Hasty seems to be a lead bandwagoneer,but if you look at where the Bowl Games are played,is it really fair?Anybody with half a brain knows the answer is a resounding NO,it is not.EVERY single Bowl Game is played in their opponents own backyard.It has become beyond ridiculous to expect the Big 10 to roll into Pasadena,New Orleans,Miami,Orlando,Dallas,Atlanta or wherever and beat a national power team like LSU,Fla,Texas and USC in a virtual home game.It is true the Big 10 has not been as good as usual the last few years,but they are also playing at a huge disadvantage.The senseless bashing is pure stupidity.
Reply
7-27-2009 @ 8:51PM
mrmncmb9 said...
i agree
7-27-2009 @ 8:58PM
Mark Hasty said...
Sorry, but I'm not buying this argument. Since the bowls have basically never changed location, that "unfair advantage" has always existed. Following your logic, that should mean the Big Ten should never have success in the bowl games. The conference is not that far removed from great seasons with multiple teams winning bowl games and finishing in the top 15.
Now go ask the bowl organizing committees how well Big Ten teams travel. I mean, I'll agree that facing USC in the Rose Bowl is a virtual road game. Not so sure I'd agree about other bowls. It was just two seasons ago that Michigan beat Florida in the Outback Bowl, for instance.
7-28-2009 @ 12:18AM
Mr.G said...
You should buy it,because it's a fact.I never even hinted that the Big 10 has NEVER had any success.They can,they have and they probably will have success again at some time.The point I was trying to make,which flew right over your head,was that the Big 10 is at a major disadvantage when it comes to Bowl games being played in their opponents home state,and to bash them when they fail to beat top 10 teams in their own backyard on a consistent basis is ridiculous.The last few years,the Conference has not fielded good enough teams to overcome that disadvantage.Last year,almost every single Big 10 Bowl Game was played in the opponents home state.Sure,the Organizing Committee knows the Big 10 FANS travel well (think money),but not so much for the teams themselves, as evidenced by their record the last few years.And sure,Michigan won the Outback played in Fla's home state,but they were a massive underdog as usual in these matchups.The Bowl Committee doesn't care about matchups as much as they care about which team puts asses in the seats and money in their pocket.Anyway,it is what it is and the Big 10 will have to deal with it the best they can.What they need right now is another Conference member,which would allow them to have a Conference Playoff Championship Game ala the SEC.This long layoff before the Bowl Games is also a disadvantage that is a more recent problem. I think ND would be well advised to join the Big 10,it might help both of their recent problems.
Reply
7-28-2009 @ 10:08AM
celtsic said...
Penn State and Paterno has an impecible record in bowl games since they were an Eastern Independent and while in the Big Ten and always play with something to prove and usually win. They just ran into a better team in USC last year. No one would have beaten the Trojans last year in Pasadena.This year however could be a different story one that JoePa knows the script all to well......WE ARE.. PENN STATE!
Reply
7-28-2009 @ 12:48PM
snappleosky said...
I wasn't saying Iowa WILL win the conference, but they're definitely contenders after beating Penn State last year and being the ONLY Big Ten team to win a bowl game. Thought they deserved a mention in your article.
Reply
7-30-2009 @ 9:36AM
skoolbeans said...
As a Ohio State fan last 40 years, Im just surprised at no team in big 11 has closed gap on Buckeyes.Oh Badger team for 2/3 years, Or Penn State for 2 years.. Im just surprised Iowa or Purdue hasn't put together teams that has 10 year run.Where they getting coaches?. JUST VERY SURPRISED IS ALL...
Reply
7-30-2009 @ 9:57PM
TICOJEFF43 said...
only a few words, GO BUCKS, the rest will take care of itself and we will be again be in a major game.the coach is sometimes very low key to attacking the game. however he and or his staff sure can recruit.look at how many players have gone to the big dance(NFL)over the last 7or 8 years chef jeff
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 1:00PM
iypgary said...
I agree somewhat with Mr. G, but I also agree Mark since you often see them do very well in bowl games. But if they ever go to a playoff I'd love to see those games played at the higer seeds home field, like the NFL. Because in the NFL the late season balance of power generally shifts to the cold weather teams. Yes, the Cards last year were an exception. So it would be very interesting to see a SEC team taking the field in Lincoln, Iowa City, or State College in Jan.
Reply