By now, you or someone you know has forwarded a link to you that may or may not have included the Erin Andrews video, the now famous video ostensibly of the ESPN reporter naked in her hotel room, filmed through a peephole. It's possible you got a woman having relations with a horse instead. With Internet videos you never know quite what to expect. (Or so I've heard.) I think virtually every person who has seen the video agrees that it crosses the line of propriety by a large stretch. But what hasn't been really talked about very much is why Erin Andrews represents more than just herself, she's a symbolic figure, a Rorschach test for modern sexual politics. Don't believe me? Dive into my mind. If you dare. I'll begin by answering this question: Can a very attractive woman ever be so good at what she does for a living that her attractiveness is ignored by men? I think the answer is no. No matter how equal the sexes ever become. And I get why that totally sucks for professional women.
Period.
That could be under federal or state law for initial or subsequent distribution. The legal complexities of this situation make my head spin.
But I don't think we'll find this person. Why? Because the most brilliant computer minds in the country can't track down those who upload viruses on the Internet. Why do we believe we'll be able to find one pervert who uploaded the Erin Andrews peephole video in a country filled with millions of perverts?
And are the millions of perverts to blame? Did the sexual undercurrent of sports culture make something like this, frankly, unsurprising?
Let's begin with a thesis that I think most men will agree with: "If women truly knew how much time we spend thinking about sleeping with them, they'd never sleep with us."
Probably for the betterment of our society most women have no clue how sex-obsessed we men are in our ordinary lives. I know many women claim to understand, but they don't actually get it. It's like men claiming to understand the pain of giving birth. In theory, we get the concept, but we can't really grasp it. Men help hide this obsession because deep down we're all a little embarrassed by how much sex or the pursuit of sex motivates our actions. At least those of us who are smart enough to realize it. Marketers, television executives, movie producers, and others who make a living off society at large are not surprised by these obsessions. It's why every time I see one of those CSI-type shows, it involves a sex-crime gone awry. Often with a hot, young victim.
Remember back when Cinemax's softcore porn got you through high school? Well, now we live in a softcore porn universe. Everyone toes the line as best they can because sex moves products. Unless, God forbid, Janet Jackson's nipple gets revealed. And then, my God? What of the children?
Sports Internet Scandals
While undressed in her hotel room, popular ESPN reporter Erin Andrews was videotaped through a peephole, and the resulting footage was posted on the Internet. Now her lawyer vows that civil and criminal charges will be filed against the perpetrator(s). Click through to see more web scandals from the sports world.
Jamie Squire, Getty Images
Blue Jays outfielder Alex Rios apologized after his profane exchange with a heckler was captured on video and uploaded to YouTube in early June. "That's not the person that I am," Rios said.
Mark Cunningham, MLB / Getty Images
Just days after British tabloid News of the World published this photo of Michael Phelps with a marijuana pipe, USA Swimming suspended the Olympic legend from competition for three months.
News of the World
In late January, Dallas Cowboys tight end Martellus Bennett was reportedly fined $22,647 for a profane YouTube rap video in which he used derogatory terms for blacks and gays.
YouTube
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Matt Leinart took a dip in some hot water, both figuratively and literally, when Web site TheDirty.com released a photo of him partying with four women in a hot tub. The photo was even featured on SportsCenter and drew the ire of head coach Ken Whisenhunt.
thedirty.com
In 2008, controversial Mavericks star Josh Howard was caught on video disrespecting the national anthem before Allen Iverson's charity flag football game. Facing the camera during the anthem, Howard said, "I don't celebrate this s--t. I'm black."
YouTube
Redskins tight end Chris Cooley revealed a little too much private information when he snapped a photo of himself with the team playbook on his lap. Underneath the playbook, Cooley's penis was visible, and he later had to offer up a public apology on his personal blog.
Joe Robbins, Getty Images
Vince Young's 2008 season was full of more questions than game play for the Tennessee Titans. Some fans doubted Vince Young's commitment to the team when photos of him partying and swigging Patron tequila were leaked on the net.
Blogxilla.com
Jeff Reed became part of a running joke on sports blogs when numerous photos leaked of the Steelers kicker clubbing with his shirt off and hair gelled up to the heavens.
Deadspin.com
Even legends get caught in an awkward position from time to time. After Michael Jordan was photographed looking intoxicated, the "drunk athlete" snapshot became Photoshop material for dozens of sports sites.
Lioninoil.blogspot.com
We've drawn a weird line here that allows some companies in America to make money off sex while claiming that they aren't actually selling sex. Meet sports leagues. They support the troops. They would never sell sex. Except when they do.
Which ties right in with Andrews. Let's be clear, she's smart. She's good at what she does on the sideline; she's well-prepared, hard-working, professional, and always ready when the camera cuts to her. But, and this is the kicker, how many people in America could do Andrews' job for ESPN every bit as well as she does? I'll tell you, tens of thousands. Maybe even a million. Put plainly, Andrews wouldn't have her job if she looked like YouTube signing sensation Susan Boyle. No matter how good she was. She just wouldn't. Her looks open doors for her that no one else gets to walk through.
Now, once she's through that door she can demonstrate that she deserves the opportunity, that she's actually good at her craft. But it's her looks that open that door. And ESPN put her on television for one reason, because viewers, mostly male, are sexually attracted to her. Put it this way, if Andrews comes on the screen and the television is muted while I'm doing work, am I more likely to turn on the television to hear what she says than if it's an unattractive woman or Chris Berman?
Yes.
Does that make me stupid?
Maybe.
Does that make me like just about every other male watching television?
I think so.
And Google proves it. While we all may be wagging our heads and tut-tutting about the immorality of the video in question, Google search knows all of our private obsessions. And Google search confirms that come Monday morning, "Erin Andrews" and derivatives were the two most popular search terms in Google; the search graph looks like a bull market. Even by Tuesday afternoon as I write this, she was still sixth, seventh and eighth.
Why is this?
Because ESPN has been selling us softcore sex via Andrews for several years, building up demand for a moment just like this. If you counted how many times men have mentally undressed Andrews while she's giving sideline reports, it would be in the billions. So it's no surprise that tens of millions have viewed the videos. Men from all walks of life, from neurosurgeons to janitors, ESPN executives to the local fan.

But I bet it is a surprise to Andrews. And that really sucks for her. And for women everywhere. It also illustrates how much difference there is between the sexes. Is there any man on earth who women would flock to see ironing clothes naked? I mean for another reason besides confirming that some men do iron clothes for themselves. President Obama? Clooney? Denzel? Mangino?
Nope, nope, nope and yikes. So, right now most women are either offended or befuddled by men's interest. Our minds aren't meeting. And it ain't the first time. The Erin Andrews video is just the latest fault line in sexual politics. Only this time, sports are intimately involved.
I'll put this in a personal context. My wife was a Tennessee Titans cheerleader. I didn't really enjoy it very much to be honest. I was happy when we moved away and she couldn't try out again. Why? Because every time the cheerleaders danced on the field and everyone stood up in the crowd, I knew most men were picking out the girl they'd most like to have sex with. I'd done it for years. Chances are if you're male and you're reading this, you've done it too. There's no other real reason for the football cheerleaders to exist from a male perspective. They're sexual fantasies brought to life.
My wife disagreed that their cheerleading role was entirely based on selling softcore sex. She enjoyed the performance aspect, learning the dance routines, the friendships with the other girls, meeting young children across the community. And that's all a part of it. But more than anything else the leagues are selling sex to their male fans. And most women have no idea how deep that river of desire actually runs.
Then one day a little girl came up to her. "When I grow up, I want to be a Titans cheerleader," the girl said, holding her dad's hand.
"Well, you can do this, but you should want to be a doctor or a lawyer," my wife said.
"Naw, cheerleader'd be good," her dad said, leering.
Later my wife pulled me aside, "Clay, I think most Titans fans would rather their daughter grow up and be a cheerleader than a lawyer."
"I think you're right," I said.
Still do.
Because I think the message we're sending, fair or foul, is that no matter how good any woman is at her job, to a large majority of the men watching her at home, she's just the hot chick that they want to see naked. And you can't tell me that ESPN executives didn't know that too. That, even as they commiserate with Andrews via e-mail, phone calls or whatnot, a large percentage of her co-workers have probably sought out the Erin Andrews video somewhere on the Internet. Because they've probably been picturing her naked, too.
Men all say we all want a son to carry on the family name. But I think in this day and age that's not true anymore. I think we all just fear having a really hot daughter.













Comments (Page 1 of 14)
This is an awfully interesting article.
I don't knnow why people tape others--something seriously lacking in their character. When I was in law school, a bunch of people videotaped a girl in her bedroom and shower and car, just for the entertainment value. She walked around campus depressed, and since the staff had no clue what was going on, they figured something was wrong with her. There wasn't anything wrong before, but once the students did this, she was never the same. She wasn't a person to them, just something to watch. It was pretty sick.
How often do we take human beings and strip away their right to privacy, and in the process, their dignity? Isn't most tabloid reporting, "entertainment" tv, and gossip doing just this?
It is interesting. Society has lost it's moral center over the last 40 years or so. Decent men use to know better then to openly acknowledge their lusts. Now, the men that should be the backbone of decency smile, shake their heads, and slap the backs of the overt pigs that continually drool. They are loosening their ties, chuckling and lusting with their own glazed eyes! Back in the 70s women tried to stand up for the rights and respect of women and were ostricised for it. They just couldn't get the cheerleader types to realize they were sex objects. We knew then that we were headed here. It's sad, but nobody should be shocked.
Here's the thing. She would never be on TV to start with if she was ugly. Her career owes everything to the way she looks. That's the only reason she has a career.
How many Big Ugly Female Basketball Players, and Softball Players that know way more about sports than this girl does, are out there? Answer, a whole lot.
Would any TV Network anywhere in the world put one of them in front of a camera?
The answer is simple. HELL NO.
Duhhh.
I don't want to hear this disingenuous stupidity about the "right to privacy" and how "decent men" don't view women like Andrews as sexual objects.
Clay Travis is right in every respect, except when he claims Andrews herself didn't realize she was selling sex. She knew it just as well as the ESPN executives knew it, in much the same way that every blond anchor on Fox News knows it. She made a conscious decision to sell herself as a sexual image in order to obtain a cushy job making lots of money. She knows it full well -- the internet is loaded with photos of her wearing sweaters so tight, the fabric seems molded to her breasts.
As we've all acknowledged, Erin Andrews would not have her job if not for her looks.
Erin Andrews chose to wear tight sweaters and cleavage-spilling tops. Erin Andrews chose to wear form-fitting pants that leave no curve of her ass to the imagination. Erin Andrews chose to giggle and tee-hee her way through interviews and the stale quips of her male co-workers on the air.
Does that make it right that someone decided to drill a peep hole and film her in her hotel room? No. But don't tell me she's shocked, or appalled, or that it's alright for TV, movie and ad executives to shove sexual images in our face and then act horrendously aggrieved when someone goes and does something like this.
In the end, all we're really talking about is a woman who decided to sell herself as a sexual object without actually admitting it, and now she's acting supremely offended because that truth was made undeniably clear with the peep hole video and the subsequent avalanche of internet search requests for it. Sorry, she's not getting my sympathy.
Cdaven, you're mistaken. The past was not some golden era of chivalry. In fact, there was a time when there was no such thing as "sexual harassment", and men were *much* more forward with their lustful thoughts than they are now. A woman in the workplace during the 1950s (if she was attractive) was the constant target of sexual pressure and ribald behavior.
At least now they have some fear of being sued.
Courtship practices have changed, but that doesn't mean men are any more or less moral now than they were in the past. What has changed is what forms of being caught men fear. Men have always, and will always, constantly bump up against the envelope of what society permits them to do sexually.
What if the person videotaping her didn't know she had a job on TV (whether or not obtained through looks) until after taping it? What if she didn't have a TV job--would that make this worse? What if she were well known because of a job on TV, movies, or radio, but was not, by any objective standards, traditionally attractive? Did she ask for the taping, then? Is she less "responsible," then? What if she was taped because she's well known, and someone wanted to make a buck, since she has name recognition? What if someone wanted to publicly degrade her, and that no matter the reason for her obtaining her job, this person didn't necessarily tape her because of her appearance? What if some people just do things that are sick, which everyone would admit was sick if it happened to them or someone they loved--no matter how public their job.
7-22-2009 @ 2:00PM devfied said...
-----------------
I went to that law school. That was the biggest not-kept secret ever. Practically everyone knew, and by the end of the year, she knew, too. Unlike this, though, she did not have a public job--she was just a student. She sat in a seat in the back of the room, was so quiet, didn't do anything to warrant being taped, unless you count her unassuming nature, modest clothing, eye glasses, ponytail, and sneakers. So if anyone thinks the only reason people tape women is because the women did something to attract the unwanted attention and invasion of their privacy, they should think again.
this article rambles on.... i get it after the third paragraph and i dont care what his wife has to say.
Umm no offense, and her privacy shouldn't be violated, but she ain't all that great lookin
"marktmurphy5" must be gay
someone totally missed the point...
Thanks for the most thoughtful piece I've seen on this matter yet, but it still tends to assume the genders as natural enemies. In general, the question "Can a very attractive woman ever be so good at what she does for a living that her attractiveness is ignored by men?" suggests that the two must be mutually exclusive. But I think that non-Neanderthal men are capable of holding two thoughts simultaneously, and that "fuckability" does not automatically wipe out any notice of a particular woman's abilities or vice versa. And there are a lot of caring males, like you, who worry about how their wives, friends, girlfriends, sisters, daughters, are viewed and treated by other men.
There are a lot of chilling aspects to this case, most pointedly, that there is a aspect of our culture that says any beautiful woman is de facto fair game for a base demand for T&A, with the assumption that she is not a human being first, but a commodity that voyeurs are entitled to. The invasion of privacy and base level of basic respect in this case must be terrible for Erin Andrews.
But myself and other women will tell you that a) we do have a clue how much most guys think about sex (we have brothers and male friends and partners who are pals who tell us lots of their "secrets", and by secrets, I mean that it's really not anything we didn't sort of know already, and b) women are capable of physically desiring attractive men, "laydreaming," and appreciating a hot naked man, in art or pictures or porn (yes, lots of women watch porn...just maybe not the same stuff you guys are watching...just sayin'). The idea that "men are from Mars" and are animals who can't help themselves from drooling over/coming onto hot wimmins, and women are crazy beings from some other planet who don't think about/want/seek out sexual fantasy and reality material (because that would make them sluts instead of healthy humans) just serves to drive more stupid behavior from two groups of PEOPLE (not interplanetarian aliens or different species) who should and often DO know better.
I love spending a Sunday afternoon lounging on the couch with a beer and some snacks, watching football all day with my boyfriend, my brothers, and our friends who love sports regardless of their gender. The only reason Tom Brady doesn't get the Erin Andrews treatment is that the powers that be, who happen to be male, are afraid of inciting gay panic. Sorry guys, but we know a hot guy when we see one too, and no, agreeing with us doesn't make you gay ;)
Well put.
Guys hate this~~"I love spending a Sunday afternoon lounging on the couch with a beer and some snacks, watching football all day with my boyfriend."
I couldn't agree with you MORE! But, since we both recognize that it is her LOOKS that opened the door for her, then she has to be prepared for ALL that goes along with stepping through it!
Absolutely. Beautiful women are more than willing to trade on their good looks. In fact, they play them up, coloring their hair blonde, wearing makeup, high heels and tight clothes. Like the author says, it opens doors for them.
And open doors is exactly what it does. Doors open for beautiful women at every turn. Some of them live their entire existence just on being beautiful. Others, like Erin, at least attempt to seem serious about her profession.
But no matter how much they pretend their success is not because of their beauty, of course, it is. Almost entirely.
And wow, do they complain when men's pre-occupation with their beauty becomes and inconvenience to them.
Did Erin Andrews deserve to be taped in the nude? No. But should she be surprised that trading almost purely on her sexuality attracted some meathead with a drill and a camera? No.
If she wanted to avoid this, she should have studied a little harder in school, instead of concentrating on how sexy she could look to become a cheerleader.
Most attorneys or physicians don't work so hard on being sexy, and are rarely videotaped by some dude in a hotel.
Just sayin'.
just becuase a woman choose to enter an industry where her looks opened the door does not mean that she is signing up for being filmed nude with out her consent. Celebritys might sign up for being photagraphed while they are out and about but this woman was in the privacy of her hotel room not out and about. Her sex appeal has been an attribute along her carreer but it doesnt mean she wanted to bear all. She did sign up for a few perhaps chauvanist comments about her but not an invasion of her privacy.
So every attractive person and every person who takes care of his or her appearance and then leaves the house and then has other people see him or her should know to expect to be videotaped? Where do you live?