The Mountain West Conference has been dissatisfied with the Bowl Championship Series system for years and their disdain hit the pinnacle when Utah finished the 2008 regular season undefeated and did not rank in the top 2, preventing the Utes from playing in the BCS National Championship Game.Utah soundly beat Alabama and finished as the lone undefeated team in America, and the MVC lobbied for an automatic bid in the BCS system. But negotiations with the MVC and the Western Athletic Conference never advanced, and both conferences signed an agreement to retain their same role in the BCS -- reluctantly.
"Today, the Mountain West Conference has executed the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) agreement and the attendant rights agreement with ESPN," the conference said in a statement on their Web site. "While the Mountain West has expressed serious concerns with the various fundamental flaws in the current BCS system, our various good faith initiatives to generate reform have thus far not been accepted."
The MVC admitted that negotiations with BCS officials weren't progressing. The current system invites a non-BCS conference team -- which includes the MVC and WAC -- into the bowl system if it finishes in the Top 12 in the BCS rankings. Utah finished in the Top 12 and therefore was invited to play Alabama in the Sugar Bowl.
The rankings are based on strength of schedule and how opponents fare during the season. Given that MVC and WAC schools play lesser schedules, the possibility of a conference member being in the BCS title game is highly unlikely under the current system. MVC officials proposed an eight-team playoff system that would allow non-BCS teams a better opportunity for a national title, but it was shot down by the BCS conferences.
"The Mountain West believes it has no choice at this time but to sign the agreements," the statement said. "If a conference wishes to compete at the highest levels of college football, and the only postseason system in place for that is the BCS, no one conference can afford to drop out and penalize its football programs and student-athletes."
The current system expires in 2013, but the MVC made it clear it wasn't satisfied with the system.
"The Mountain West will continue its efforts for change," the statement concluded, "including a request for dialogue with representatives of the BCS. Our goal is to ensure the eventual outcome of these endeavors is what our universities and student-athletes need, what the vast majority of American sports fans want, and what is long overdue: an equitable system."




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-09-2009 @ 2:14AM
cjgdnight said...
Utah did just beat ALA.... they beat them up!
Ala was missing their OT and that did matter, but Utah 'O' physically beat the crap out of ALA "D".
All due respect to FLA a more than worthy champion, but Utah would have had my vote for #1 since they didn't play and ALA was the common opponent.
The thing that does have to change is that the power conferences should have to play any pre season contenders from the WAC etc to give them enough "credibility" to get to a BCS game if they win. The NCAA should have a policy to step in and force a schedule if the smaller school "needs" it. And none of this all home games for the big school... they need to go home and home.
Reply
7-09-2009 @ 10:46AM
Keith Winnings said...
For starters, scheduling should be done like the NFL. If that is a factor, then the defending champs should have the toughest schedule in the nation. Make them earn everything they get. At least that way we would get to see some quality games and a true champion. Second, it's not the players' fault who they play. So don't punish them for going out and doing what they are supposed to do. Utah should have been in the championship game. The year before, Hawaii. Maybe not because they were the best teams, but because they did their jobs and won all of their games. The whole system is a joke anyway and always will be until a playoff system is put in place.
Reply
7-09-2009 @ 6:17PM
jaymjefferson said...
It is all about money. The big Schools want to keep it for themselves. They don ot want to share with the smaller confernces. Why is Notre Dame in the mix, MONEY nothing else. They stink now and should be taken out of the BCS mix.The so-call midmajors will never get a chance
Reply
7-09-2009 @ 7:55PM
lilelf98 said...
Do away with the BCS and go with the traditional bowl system. This is college football with "student" athletes. In everyone's heart their school is number one. Playoffs are not in the best interest of student athletes. Get rid of rankings, get rid the BCS and let us enjoy the bowl games for what they are, an honor for the student athletes to be rewarded for their play on the field.
Reply
7-11-2009 @ 2:03AM
Bob said...
Okay, I'll bite--why is the word "West" continually represented by the letter "V" in this article? Isn't it the MWC?
Reply