Several years after allegations first arose that Reggie Bush accepted cash and gifts, several days after letting embattled basketball coach Tim Floyd 'quit' and a day after Los Angeles Times columnist Bill Plaschke slammed them for their silence, USC commented about the investigations.Essentially, USC re-affirmed its commitment to silence until the investigation concludes but did take time to accuse several individuals of lying about their involvement in the investigation.
It has been publicly alleged that USC has avoided interviewing Bush accuser Lloyd Lake, something the university forcefully denied. From USC Senior VP for administration Todd Dickey:
I do feel obligated to correct a couple of things that have been reported in the media. Specifically, reports with respect to USC's attempts to contact Lloyd Lake or Louis Johnson or participate in their interviews have been inaccurate.Dickey also denied the allegation that USC didn't interview O.J. Mayo/Tim Floyd accuser Louis Johnson.
In fact USC repeatedly asked to participate in the NCAA's interview of Mr. Lake. However, Mr. Lake and his attorneys refused to allow the University to participate in either his interview or the interviews of his relatives. It is correct that USC sent a letter to Mr. Lake's attorney requesting an interview - which was later obtained by the Los Angeles Times- but neither Mr. Lake nor his attorney agreed to that request.
The statement that USC has not interviewed Louis Johnson is also false. Mr. Johnson has twice been interviewed jointly by USC, the NCAA, and the Pac-10. Any suggestion that USC has not taken these allegations seriously and investigated them thoroughly is simply wrong.It is a statement, backed by the weight of the university, that can't help but undercut the credibility of their accusers and heighten the notion that they've been seeking to shake down USC, Mayo and Bush and are willing to lie publicly to achieve their goals.
Unfortunately the statements will also frustrate as the public and media seek something more concrete about USC's interpretation of events, be it an admission of guilt or a denial. For too long the story has been advanced in an entirely one-sided fashion as the NCAA and all involved parties on USC's side have clammed up.
Into that void, the various accusers have driven the public perception of what actually happened. Maybe their version of the events is entirely true. Certainly some of it is truthful and documented. But their collective credibility is fairly low and when they're seemingly caught lying like this one has to wonder about just how much of the unsavory stuff is true if they can't keep things straight in public.
Unfortunately we won't know until the NCAA wraps things up, releasing both the organization and USC to comment publicly, release findings and begin that awkward sanctions dance we've been witness to this offseason with Alabama, Florida State and now Memphis.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-12-2009 @ 9:17AM
Greg said...
The USC program has been dirty ever since the arrival of pete carroll and yet the ncaa will continue to ignore their violations all in the name of big bucks.
Reply
6-12-2009 @ 1:21PM
Chris said...
Did you write this article all by yourself or did you plagiarize again? If USC doesn't get hit with some scholly losses and a bowl ban for a few seasons then the NCAA will come off as an even bigger joke than they are now. Why is USC getting a pass for these major violations so far when we all know had these same violations been committed by just about any other school in the nation they would have already been given the death penalty? What a joke.
Reply
6-12-2009 @ 1:38PM
Brian Grummell said...
Criminy I didn't plagiarize. The headline from that entry is an incredibly common phrase and I had not seen Matt's writeup before adding that headline.
Additionally, my opinion was almost the complete opposite of his on the issue. I love the Rose Bowl, tradition, don't want a playoff, Matt has a completely different view from mine.
As to this entry, how is USC a joke? They are at present the top program in college football.
They aren't getting a pass, they will be punished, that much is certain. The investigation is taking a long time because there are some very complex NCAA issues involved, you've got Bush and Mayo not cooperating and the NCAA is having to rely on ex-cons and some really shady individuals as the basis for this investigation.
Reply
6-13-2009 @ 10:31AM
Chris said...
THE Top program in the country? I hope by top program you mean team that chokes away a game to a much lesser team for no apparent reason. I can agree with that. Last I checked Florida has won 2 MNCs since since USC has won their last one. I know you're just talking out of your ass to get a rise. I'm not saying USC isn't one of the best but it is a joke that the NCAA hasn't come down on them like a ton of bricks yet. Now with the entire Floyd paying for players thing I think USC may have finally forced the NCAA hand in the matter. I hope so because it's about damn time. What on earth will you plagiarize about when USC loses tons of scholarships and gets a 3 season bowl ban?
6-12-2009 @ 3:11PM
DP said...
The fact that Mayo and Bush are not "cooperating" doesn't throw up any red flags!??!?! Hellloooooo.......... If they are innocent then why aren't they addressing the issues and trying to squelch any wrong-doing??? The longer this goes on, the more their names and reputations get drug through the mud even if they are innocent (which I highly, highly doubt).
I've said it before and I'll say it again - the NCAA isn't doing anything that would hamper the USC money making machine. The minute Pete Carroll retires or leaves....BAM!!! NCAA penalties up the wazoo.
Reply
6-13-2009 @ 1:38AM
FLACO said...
Your right Brian to assume that only ex-cons lie and not millionaires......If you feel a snake in your boots most likely its a snake..Just like the one who left SC for Washington....He's next for some NCAA violations just watch and wait...
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 3:14AM
eyey99 said...
ok geniuses... listen up. for a school to get penalized, the ncaa would have to prove that the school knew about what was going on and that they were participants. the basketball program is screwed because the scum bag tim floyd. he was caught giving money to mayo's "business partners". they should be penalized. they have yet to find anything on carrol and the football program. just because bush received gifts from agents doesnt make usc wrong. if they can prove usc knew about it and didnt do anything, then yes. but until then, stop talking out of your ass people.
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 6:32PM
Clay said...
You sir have no clue what you're talking about. If the school doesn't know about any wrong doing it they can still be penalized. If Reggie Bush accpeted gifts that means he lost his eligibily. That in turn means that USC was playing a player that is ineligible and can be made to forfeit any game that he competed in. Up to and including bowl games and conference championships. The school may get off easier if it is proved they had no knowledge of wrong doing but there is also a little thing called lack of institutional control. Not saying it would apply to USC in this case, but it is out there for the schools who don't properly monitor their student athletes. Take a look at the recent ruling against Alabama for the most recent example of a school not knowing about the wrong doing but still being punished. How about you get a clue what you're talking about before you come on here spewing complete and total BS.
6-21-2009 @ 11:05PM
tjem12360 said...
Well said eyey99. Above idiots aren't versed very well in the legal field. Their just upset
because USC is the best of the rest. Smells like SEC fans such as Alabama or Florida. We got the best of everything and they can't take it. Pete Carroll is the best coach and USC has the best program since 2001, case closed! Last year, USC should have played Florida, but some writers
didn't want USC to get their 12 championship. They had the best defense that would have shut down Tebow and the kids. I just wish the SEC
power houses such as Florida, LSU,and Alabama would have the balls to schedule USC. LSU refused USC in 2004, fact!
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 6:42PM
Clay said...
Aren't versed very well in the legal field? That has to be the single dumbest comment I have ever read on fanhouse. Please see my reply to your buddy above your post Councelor. As far as some writers not wanting USC to get to the title game, if USC didn't choke away games to lesser competition the writers wouldn't be involved.
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 6:52PM
Clay said...
Aren't versed very well in the legal field? Not sure where you got your law degree counselor, but you might want to ask for a refund. Please see my above comment to your buddy. And just so you know, USC didn't make it to the MNC game this past season because they lost yet again to a team that had no business beating them. The writers had nothing to do with it.
Reply
6-23-2009 @ 3:19AM
eyey99 said...
oh clay, you are so smart. you constantly think anyone who defends usc is just speaking out of emotion and not logic. stop referring to "the lesser team". losing an average of one game a year still makes usc the most dominant program of the 2000 era. so stop that dumb argument. (btw, in case you missed it, oregon state turned out to be a heck of a team. lesser than sc yes, but isn't every team "lesser")?
you want the ncaa to take away games bush played in? go ahead. thats the only way you can beat them in the long run. not on the field, but punishment off of it. and just so you know, the bigger your program, the harder to control off the field events. if you think the coaching staff can monitor 80 players a year, all year, for 8 years, then you are dumber than the agents that give them money and think they can get away with it. try having a successful program and monitoring every superstar. things like the bush incident can happen and unfortunately, i do think he was compensated. but only haters and jealous fans say the coaches and staff new about it and contributed.
go ahead, take the championships away from them haters. they'll just win more in the future.
6-23-2009 @ 10:51AM
Clay said...
Eye - You're absolutely right. How in the world is a university supposed to keep up with and monitor everything their players do? Unfortunately, the NCAA expects every university to do exactly that. I may be dumb, but I know that if a player is caught receiving improper benefits it will cost the team. USC is by far one of the best programs of the past decade and that in my opinion is not even debatable. There is also no doubt in my mind that you have no clue what you're talking about when it comes to the NCAA. Like I said before, even if the coaches had no clue what was going on it won't stop the NCAA from dropping the hammer on them if they can prove Bush did in fact get receive improper benefits. That is my point. You came on here calling other people stupid for not understanding how the NCAA works when you obviously have no clue.
Reply
6-27-2009 @ 2:16PM
eyey99 said...
i understand your point! my point is, the penalties handed down will vary!!!!! do you not get it? it would be a far worse penalty if the coaches new about it. in basketball, they are screwed! they have evidence of the scumbag coach giving cash away. in football, there is no such evidence. penalize bush. take away his stats, his heisman, his games, whatever. f-him for doing that to the program. but don't penalize them for future games if the coaches didn't know about it. are we on the same page now? peopel calling pete carrol a cheat when they have ZERO evidence is a bit premature dont you think?
6-28-2009 @ 12:30AM
Clay said...
Now that you're changing what you said in the first place we are on the same page. Remember these quotes?
"for a school to get penalized, the ncaa would have to prove that the school knew about what was going on and that they were participants."
And lets not forget this one, "just because bush received gifts from agents doesnt make usc wrong. if they can prove usc knew about it and didnt do anything, then yes."
I agree that it sucks that because one player cheated the entire program has to suffer, but that's the way the NCAA handles things. My point was that you shouldn't come on here calling people out when you have the facts wrong. Do you not get it?
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 3:20PM
per2051 said...
UNLESS YOU EXPERTS ARE ATTRONEYS AND NOW THE LAW IT IS BEST TO KEEP YOUR IGNORE IDEAS TO YOURSELFS LET THINGS HAPPEN WHEN THEY HAPPEN I AGREE IF BUSH DID WHAT THEY SAY HE DID THEY SHOULD PENILIZE HIM TO THE FULLESS NOT THE USC PROGRAM CARROL IS PROBABLY THE GREATEST COACH IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL AND ALL YOU USC HATERS CAN'T STAND IT SO SHUT UO AND MAY THE VBEST TEAM WIN GO USCD
Reply