Every Monday during college football's endless offseason, The FanHouse Walk will put last week's stories to bed and deliver the essentials to bridge that agonizing space between now and September.Rap, Rap, Rapping At The Door -- Bad news is best delivered on Friday, so no surprise when it was discovered that in the new BCS contract the Rose Bowl must fill one of its slots to a non-BCS team (think Boise State or Utah) if it loses either the Big 10 or Pac-10 champion to the BCS championship game.
There are the Rose Bowl haters out there snarking away on this, but I think its another sad day for college football. Everyone bemoans the USC/Illinois type matchups in Pasadena, but I still find it fresh and what the Rose Bowl is all about. The various Miami/Nebraka, Texas/Michigan, USC/Texas type matchups were all enjoyable, but something has never felt right about them.
Game Theory At Work -- Several years ago, college football added a 12th regular season game. The obvious dilemma for conferences was whether to sneak in another conference matchup or add another non-conference opponent of the pushover variety. Everyone but the Pac-10 opted for the second option while the Pac-10 did the right thing in working out a round-robin format to better determine its champion.
Problem is, others have benefited from that decision using the Pac-10's modest perception against it even though they've added an automatic game against a major conference opponent in doing so. Naturally, some out west are unhappy about the turn of events and are looking to reverse the move. Score one for the heavy costs of doing the right thing being turned against you.
The sad truth is that the greed and power grab that was the SEC's move to a 12-team conference (and later followed by the Big 12 and ACC) has been terrible in many ways for college football. Its made certain powers more wealthy but has also cynically manipulated scheduling to where the actual good guys who tried to do things right and piece together conferences that weren't bigger in number than actual possible game dates have suffered most.
Think about it, what kind of conference championship involves not playing all the actual members of your confernce? Sure you can split a conference into divisions and have division winners play in a "championship" game but come on, that's flimsy cover for what is essentially an incomplete championship.
Appropriate Silence? -- Much hay has been made about the Los Angeles Times' two-part broadside directed towards USC's public stonewalling in regards to the Reggie Bush and O.J. Mayo investigations. The argument boils down to what is essentially heavy whining about USC's silence without advancing any actual news in the story.
As a USC alum, I'm frustrated with the program's silence but its ridiculous to attach much meaning to it other than that's how USC's going to play things. In case the Times didn't notice, the NCAA hasn't exactly been very public with its thoughts on the situation either. Evenhandedness requires applying an even hand, something that's entirely missing from the twin critiques.
Christmas In June -- Rejoice! The Phile Steele 2009 College Football Preview magazine has arrived. This thing is like the Bible for many college football fans. I was introduced to it several years ago and have enjoyed it ever since, as it goes with me nearly everywhere.
Some folks get wrapped up in the various predictions that don't always pan out but the real meat of the publication is in its various methodology and trend-watching hidden between its pages. Its VHT (very highly touted in Steele speak), be sure to pick up a copy.
Overtime, Ball on the 25
-- The stretches of games that could topple non-BCS contenders like TCU, BYU and Utah
-- Receiver Josh Smith is leaving Colorado to pursue a music career, something not available among the majors in Boulder
-- The costs continue to rise for BCS conference programs looking for non-conference fodder in home games. Pssssssst, find someone your own size, going undefeated isn't everything
-- Heisman Pundit offers up the fastest players in college football for 2009




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-01-2009 @ 4:19PM
wdyea said...
"The various Miami/Nebraka, Texas/Michigan, USC/Texas type matchups were all enjoyable, but something has never felt right about them."
Something never felt right about the USC/Texas matchup for the national championship? What!? Probably the only championship game of the decade without controversy?
Reply
6-01-2009 @ 4:43PM
jerry said...
I know it's coincidence, subliminal mistake, something like that, but Dr. Saturday used the exact same "barbarians at the gates" subject line last Friday.
Reply
6-01-2009 @ 7:41PM
Clay said...
And the topic is exactly the same. What are the odds?
6-02-2009 @ 5:25PM
Steve said...
You say the Rose Bowls without Big 10-PAC 10 matchups don't feel right. This tradition thing is strange. The Big 10-PAC 10 matchups didn't start until thirty years into the Rose Bowl. Does this mean that those early Rose Bowls were wrong? I don't really understand the tradition argument. Things change.
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 9:03AM
Antonio said...
Get rid of these bogus bowl and go to a playoff. What is this guy talking about? The Rose bowl is better with these match ups. But I think you did convince me. Get rid of the Rose bowl. Get rid of all the bowls, please.
Reply
6-05-2009 @ 10:46PM
Clay said...
Brian,
No response to the plagiarism?
Reply
7-28-2009 @ 10:23AM
celtsic said...
USC and the Pac ten does have an advantage when playing in the Rose bowl but even though I'm a Penn State/Big(11)Ten fan I'll let USC off the hook since they have and do travel to play the best teams anywhere in the land. They played Penn State in State college a few times and in the kick off classic in New Jersey which is Penn States backyard.It's too cold to play bowls in the east and north so the Big Ten should create some kind of kick off classic where as a Big ten team invites a powerhouse from another section.Play the game on a Nuetral field close to the Big ten's team that is playing.
Reply