The University of Tennessee extended a scholarship offer to 6-foot-5, 255 pound Daniel Hood of Knoxville Catholic High School. Hood has solid grades, a great ACT score, hasn't gotten in trouble in high school, and is a three-star recruit. There's just one problem: At the age of 13 he was convicted of aggravated kidnapping and the rape of his first cousin with a toilet plunger after covering 70 percent of her body with duct tape. Hood later appealed the conviction, which the appeals court rejected.On Tuesday, Hood signed scholarship papers with Tennessee, and the university immediately began the public relations campaign to justify his admission. University president Mike Hamilton, coach Lane Kiffin, and the head of public relations for the university all issued statements on the signing. So did officials at Knoxville Catholic High School and Daniel Hood. But Hood's conviction raises a couple of intriguing questions, can you do something so bad at 13 that you don't deserve a second chance? And do sports really even qualify as a second chance? Especially when playing sports for the University of Tennessee is a privilege, not a right.
(Warning: Court transcripts after the jump involve mature language.)
The facts of each case dictate how we view the defendants. All crimes are not created equal. Sometimes the details can be so heinous, they're hard to escape. Such is the case with Daniel Hood. Merely stating that he has "character issues" is a trite euphemism that disguises what actually happened on August 11, 2003. That night Hood and an older friend, 17-year-old Robert Sanrico, who is currently serving 10 years in prison, raped and kidnapped a 14-year-old girl.
From the Tennessee Court of Appeals opinion:
"The defendant (Hood) and Sanico then carried the victim to the defendant's bedroom. She was placed face down on one of the beds in the room. The victim testified that both the defendant and Sanico continued to laugh. She stated that she began to kick them, and that, in response to this kicking, "somebody grabbed [her] legs and held them together." Either the defendant or Sanico then placed a strip of duct tape across the victim's eyes. A piece of tape was next placed over her mouth. The victim testified that she could no longer see or speak. Her ankles were then taped together. The victim stated that she felt two hands holding her ankles together while the other individual applied the tape to her ankles."
Last year Daniel Hood was named Mr. Football in the state of Tennessee. He led his high school, Knoxville Catholic, to a 15-0 record and a class 3A state title. Along the way he amassed 27 scholarship offers from schools across the country. Then schools began to hear the details about the 2003 incident, his "character issue," and offers began to dry up. Soon Lincoln and his 3.8 GPA and 27 ACT had no major scholarship offers.
"The victim next testified to hearing Sanico tell the defendant to get a toilet plunger and cellophane. The defendant retrieved a plunger from the bathroom connected to his bedroom. The victim then heard the door to the defendant's bedroom open and shut. At this point, either the defendant or Sanico exited the bedroom and retrieved the cellophane from the kitchen. The duct tape that was tying her ankles together was then removed. The victim testified that she began to kick. In the struggle, she was flipped back onto her stomach, face down. She testified that the defendant and Sanico restrained her legs. Her legs were then pulled apart, and each ankle was taped to the side of the bed frame."
In sports we're often asked to give second chances to athletes for off-field transgressions. Sometimes that extends into third, fourth and fifth chances. Generally we comply because when it comes right down to it, we're all liberals in the case of talented athletes; we believe that with the right environment, the right coaching, the right support, they can succeed.
But often this distinction is artificial. We're not asking whether or not Daniel Hood should get a second chance in life. Plainly, he already has. With his GPA, his test scores, and his graduation from a top private school in Knoxville, he'd likely be admitted to dozens of colleges, free to pursue whatever course of study he chose. None of that would be an issue. Daniel Hood has already received his second chance at life.
"The cover or blanket was then taken off of the victim. Sanico inserted the handle of the plunger, which had been wrapped in the cellophane, inside the victim's vagina. Sanico asked the defendant if he wanted to do it himself. The defendant answered, "No, man, that's my cousin." After the plunger was taken out of the victim's vagina, a liquid was poured onto her body. According to the victim's testimony, the defendant and Sanico stated that the liquid was Sanico's urine. Later testimony would suggest that the liquid was actually Kool Aid."
Daniel Hood's football highlight film on Rivals.com has been watched 17,594 times.
The defendant later cut the tape from the victim's wrists. The victim immediately removed the tape from her eyes and mouth. The victim next cut the tape that was restraining her ankles to the bed. She testified that the defendant and Sanico began watching television as if nothing had occurred. The victim walked out of the defendant's bedroom with 70% of her body covered in duct tape. She encountered Collins [Tasha Collins, another cousin staying in the home that night] and asked Collins to retrieve her clothes from the defendant's bedroom. The victim then called a friend and asked the friend to pick her up. The friend arrived about five minutes later and took her to the hospital."
Now we're faced with a more difficult question, should a second chance at life extend to athletics? Can anyone who has read the actual details of this incident really feel that comfortable rooting for this kid on the football field? This isn't a case of accusation where an athlete deserves a presumption of innocence. This is the case of a kid found guilty and a court of appeals affirming that conviction.
Hood's victim doesn't oppose his playing football for Tennessee. In the nearly six years since this incident, Hood has not been in trouble. Daniel Hood will run through the T this fall only because he was such a young juvenile when he committed this crime that he didn't go to prison. Otherwise instead of wearing orange and white next fall, Hood would be wearing an orange prison jumpsuit.
There's something really wrong with that. And I think it ultimately says more about us, than it does about Daniel Hood.






















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
5-06-2009 @ 4:32PM
sportsfntic22 said...
This is a troubling story and a public relations nightmare for any university
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 5:59PM
Nyxterida5 said...
Yep, it's a public relations nightmare...for AOL! I think AOL should pull this story! This reporter has no scruples; not one iota of sense of what an ethical backbone is all about! Clearly, the reporter is violating the spirit of the law designed to protect children!
5-06-2009 @ 5:11PM
whaaa said...
One of the better posts I have read on this blog.
Everyone deserve a second chance but for a school of Tenn caliber to be that one institution offering it, is a pretty telling sign of how far that program has fallen since Kiffin took over.
Tenn has stooped pretty low on this one.
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 5:23PM
jwal717 said...
I cannot believe the details of a crime a 13 YEAR OLD committed can be legally published.
This is very troubling.
I understand it is a public record because the other man involved was tried as an adult, but there is a reason you never see Hood's name in the documents.
That fact that you published the info - knowing who the defendant was, and that he was underage - should be a crime.
Reply
5-17-2009 @ 12:57AM
Disbelief said...
I am disgusted with your outrage at the RAPIST being "harmed" in this scenario. I don't care how old or young he was when this occurred. It is wrong at ANY age. This poor excuse for a human being shouldn't be granted a free college education just because he was 13 when this happened (13-year-olds know rape is wrong) and he happens to be talented, and "protecting" him should fall low on the list of priorities. What about protecting this young girl from being raped by her cousin?! What a revolting set of priorities you have.
5-06-2009 @ 5:49PM
foustanela said...
Clay, digging this out on this kid proves that you are a bigger idiot than he was when he was 13!!!!!! He has apparently redeemed himself, whereas there is no hope for you!
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 6:26PM
dinohealth said...
I agree. AOL should seriously consider pulling this story. Printing this story, if it does not violate privacy laws, violates any notion I ever held about what is decent for AOL to print. It is not even fit for tabloid use. This reporter is a complete moron.
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 6:48PM
shabs33 said...
I think this story brings up interesting points. First, obviously this student-athlete is worthy of a scholarship (it seems 27 in fact), but most backed off after they found out about his past. Kiffin has acted as a new sheriff in Knoxville thus far and for him to allow this student-athlete with serious background issues, is troubling as a Vols fan. Secondly, it brings to mind that people change and over 4-5 years, it seems that this guy has changed. I hope he can stay on the straight and narrow, but I'm not 100% sold.
Also, Clay thanks for reporting this story, it obviously has generated strong feelings and I hope that you can continue to do that at Fanhouse.
Reply
5-07-2009 @ 10:07AM
dinohealth said...
The issue is not so much the reporter not using good judgement, the issue is AOL printing this story! Let's bury this kid for 21 lousy comments in here....! This, sucks!
5-06-2009 @ 7:45PM
divetheyukon said...
So I guess second chances are only good if you don't use them to excel. The reporter states that he has no issue with Hood attending college etc. just getting an athletic scholarship. So it's ok if he wants to study, but not to play football? Hmmm. Besides, who's really getting the better deal here. Hood with a free education or the University making tons of money off the football team?
I feel that you either give a second chance or you don't, but don't tell Hood it's OK for him to do anything as long as he doesn't enjoy it too much or God forbid, eventually make a lot of money. A second chance means, go ahead, make the best out of your live.
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 7:47PM
mikewms1028 said...
I don't think Clay has crossed an ethical line here at all. He is asking an honest question that becomes alot more difficult to answer when detached from the facts. I read on deadspin that this kid raped someone but none of the details were posted over there. I can tell you my initial reaction from reading about rape to reading about bondage and what was essentially sadism are completely different.
I don't know if what this kid did deserves a second chance or not but to have a meaningful debate on the issue without know the facts would be silly.
Great article Clay.
Reply
5-15-2009 @ 9:17AM
zatannazatarra said...
You - really? You read that he'd raped a child and thought "Eh, maybe he deserves a second chance" and then you saw that he'd tied her down and thought "oh, that's sadism, that's bad"??
REALLY?
WHAT DO YOU THINK RAPE IS?
Having the details makes the situation seem more real but it should not cause a "completely different" reaction. It's kind of horrifying that you would take sexual assault so lightly.
5-10-2009 @ 10:35PM
Mark said...
Huh, who knew Tennessee had incest?
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 8:06PM
bigflyer said...
The penalty for this rapist will be the taunts from opposing school's fans.
I know it is a weak response, but maybe he will suffer as he should.
Nebraska had a running back who played for the Packers who pulled a "girlfriend" down the stairs by her hair, and then took a dump in her closet.
Until we stop putting athletes on a pedastal, this will continue.
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 8:13PM
mm3rdeye said...
THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WANT TO GIVE HIM A SECOND CHANCE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO GIVE MICHEAL VICK A SECOND CHANCE. HYPOCRITICAL RACIST A$$HOLES. I LOVE IT WHEN GOD EXPOSES THESES HYPOCRITES.
Reply
5-07-2009 @ 12:49AM
grimslade5 said...
Micheal Vick is a grown man, Hood was 13! Also, I am all for Vick being reinstated.
5-07-2009 @ 12:29PM
mswatts10 said...
The difference between Michael Vick and this young man is several years of age. Vick was a grown man and knew he was breaking the law. The court is preparing to give him a second chance and we will see how he handles it.
In reading the transcript, it sounds like this kid got in over his head with someone who was really troubled. It doesn't sound to me like Hood had any of the ideas and was just going along with it. He is young and seems to have done well for himself as he has grown up. I think it is great that he will be allowed to play.
5-07-2009 @ 1:15PM
emates said...
There's a difference between child rape and abusing animals. To pretend they are the same crime is ridiculous. Vick served his time for a crime honestly leaps and bounds less egregious than raping an underage cousin.
5-06-2009 @ 8:13PM
Mark said...
This article should've been written. How many of you wouldve cried if this hadnt been brought to "light" and then he did something else? It's great he hasnt done anything else (or at least not been caught) but its a horrible thing happened.
Reply
5-06-2009 @ 8:17PM
Craigo said...
I find it extremely troubling that several users apparently have less trouble with Hood's crimes than with Clay writing about them. Check your priorities and re-arrange as needed.
Reply