Traffic in South Florida delayed both schools team buses from arriving at the site of the BCS national title game on time as scheduled, a trivial tidbit to the season's final game you'd be excused for not knowing.Oklahoma's record-setting offensive unit did eventually make it, but if you watched Florida's 24-14 win over the Sooners, you'd be excused for not knowing that either.
Because what took the field was trivial compared to the biblical 702-point offense that burned through the Big 12 and burned out scoreboards.
After a season in which they spent more time scoring in the 60s than Tiger Woods in his best week, Oklahoma's high-octane offense played like it had a pound of sugar in its gas tank, a herky-jerky rendering of a once prolific offense.
It was less like they were playing football and more like every member of the team had been simultaneously asked to recite the alphabet backwards. It was like watching Usain Bolt run the 100-meters only after twirling around enough to make himself dizzy.
And in the end it rendered 360 yards. Two interceptions. Fourteen measly points.
One awfully familiar feeling.
Another year, another bowl loss for Oklahoma. And it only seems to be getting worse.
When all is said about the Sooners' 2008 season, there will be plenty to remember with pride: The Big 12 championship, the NCAA-record point total, the reckoning they laid at the feet of Texas Tech, the biggest Bedlam beating in Stillwater since 1983, the dual 1,000-yard rushers, Sam Bradford's Heisman trophy and highlight after highlight after highlight.
For some schools, even with the loss in the BCS title game, it's the kind of season that can get buildings constructed on campus and named for every member of the coaching staff.
At Oklahoma, it's reason to kick your own dog.
All season, Oklahoma's offensive prowess had been more a law of nature than statistical trend. They scored 60 against five straight teams. Four of those teams went on to play in bowls. All of those four won at least nine games.
So watching Bradford and the offense look quizzically at Florida was a little like putting water in the freezer only to watch it boil.
It was the biggest stage, they no-showed it like an Evite from Pacman Jones.
Stop us when you've heard this one before.
For Oklahoma, it was their fifth straight BCS bowl loss. Back-to-back BCS title game losses in 2004 and '05. A shocking Fiesta Bowl loss to Boise State in 2006. An embarrassment at the hands of West Virginia in 2007. And then this. Somewhere, even Ohio State is snickering.
And the man they once called "Big Game Bob" now has a nickname that seems as antiquated as the firmly midwestern Michigan's "Champions of the West" sobriquet.
But in the rubble of Oklahoma's season, he at least had a firm grasp on one thing.
"You lose a game," Stoops said, looking like he'd just been run over by the Sooner Schooner, "through the whole process of the game."
And the process was ugly.
There were debatable coaching calls, like the decision to run, and get stood up, on fourth-and-goal in the second quarter, a decision that will likely remain as a mark on Stoops' resume, or the even stranger option to let kicker Jimmy Stevens try a 49-yard field goal when his longest of the season was 42 yards.
There was the Heisman winner Bradford trying to jam a pass into Manny Johnson between four defenders on the goal line at the end of the first half, a ball that would be tipped by all of them and intercepted by Major Wright, yet another red zone failure for a team so automatic inside the 20 this season. And the defense, which played marvelously through three quarters, just couldn't stop Tim Tebow in the final 15 minutes anymore than they could stop an avalanche with a snow shovel.
There were highlights. The Gators never came up with an answer for tight end Jermaine Gresham, who caught both touchdowns. Chris Brown ran for 110 yards. And that maligned defense stood up for itself in a big way, limiting Florida to its lowest scoring output of the season.
But those highlights seemed to pass even faster than Florida's Percy Harvin could outrun the Sooner defense.
And the problem for Oklahoma is that they may have missed their championship window in the near future as an exodus of NFLers bolt out of Norman, particularly on its record-setting offense unit. Bradford has reportedly all but made up his mind to go to the NFL and most of his city-block of an offensive will join him. Only right tackle Trent Williams will remain behind. Gresham, a junior, is expected to leave early while top targets Johnson and Juaquin Iglesias are both seniors.
The good news is that Oklahoma is more dynasty than program. The Sooners will never have to stand in line at college football's soup kitchens.
But, like gameday itself, when exactly Oklahoma will successfully arrive on a national stage again, is a bit of a mystery.
Yes, Oklahoma finally got off the bus Thursday. But make no mistake, these Sooners are still stuck.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
1-09-2009 @ 9:15AM
Steve said...
Why does Ohio St (full disclosure: I am in NO way an Ohio State fan, but I am a Big Ten fan) get beaten down for it's BCS failures while Oklahoma has been much worse? Ohio St got upset against Florida, lost as an underdog to LSU, and barely lost as a big underdog to Texas this year. Before that, they manhandled Notre Dame, beat Kansas State, and beat a Miami team that some regarded as "the best ever" for a National Championship. In that same time frame, Oklahoma won the Rose Bowl, then suffered losses in BCS bowls at the hands of LSU, USC (a 55-19 demolition), a massive underdog Boise State, a West Virginia team without a real head coach, and now this loss to Florida. Yet everyone talks about Ohio State and their penchant for choking in the big one.
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 11:28AM
Guvnah said...
The reason, Steve, is that a bunch of idiot journalists and coaches who do nothing more than look at the scoreboard results, see 60+ points on the board and start running around like Steve Martin's Ruprecht, beating a pot with a wooden spoon and chanting...
"OOOOklahoma-oklahoma-oklahoma-oklahoma!"
No-class Stoops leaves his starters in and continues to run a no-huddle, hurry-up offense when he's up by 30 in the 2nd half, putting meaningless points on the board, because he knows that idiot journalists will marvel at these meaningless points and vote his team higher.
How many times over the past month have you heard some variation of Ray's comment that "They scored 60 against five straight teams"?
60 points! Against 5 straight teams! Oh my, they must be AWESOME! Nobody's EVER done THAT before!
The reason nobody's done that before is that just about every other coach in the country, aside from no-class Stoops, realizes that not only are those points MEANINGLESS, but they reflect abysmal sportsmanship.
Stoops gets his wish... again and again... he gets votes based on a meaningless metric.
And then he and his teams get utterly exposed.
Last night, Bradford showed once again what he showed against Texas. It's not that he doesn't handle pressure well... It's that he doesn't handle pressure AT ALL.
The OSU is a better football team than the Sooners. And they have a coach with class, who doesn't run up the score with meaningless points.
As far as I'm concerned, the team that has always (for the past several years) deserved the reputation as big game choke artists is OU, not The OSU.
1-09-2009 @ 11:12AM
DP said...
The reason OSU gets bashed is because of the overall strength (or lack of) in the conference. OU does not get nailed like OSU because the media (ahem....ESPN) is in love with OU just about as much as USC. Everything is a bed of roses for OU and USC regardless. You don't see ESPN reporting on the Reggie Bush fiasco and you won't see them knock on Bobby Poops either. Poops made questionable call after questionable call last night but they won't talk about that. To OU....Karma baby, K A R M A !!!!!!!!!!
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 12:26PM
DM said...
Neither of these two teams deserve to be national champion. They both play like crap, and USC could beat either one of them, or both of them combined. USC had one half of bad football all season, and they almost came back and won that game in the second half. Tell me again why a one-loss Florida team is better than a one-loss USC team? Oh, I forgot, because the sports media is in love with the SEC and the midwest teams, and they don't think much of the western teams, even though almost every time USC plays one of those SEC or midwestern teams they beat them by 25 points, and the fact that USC has more national championships than any other school in the country. More than Notre Dame, Miami, Alabama, Texas, Florida, Auburn, Ohio State, Michigan, Tennessee, LSU, Nebraska, etc.. etc...
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 1:03PM
Guvnah said...
DM:
I won't argue that USC wouldn't beat OU or Florida.
But please. "The sports media is in love with the SEC and midwest temas..." that's true as far as it goes, but go cry your "USC gets no respect" river somewhere else.
USC is constantly talked up by every sportscaster within shouting distance of a microphone. Pete Carroll is constantly hailed as one of the top 3 coaches in college football. People slobber over the recruits that they get -- having a hammerlock on the biggest state in the country and the ability to pull players in from anywhere. They've gone to a BCS bowl for 7 or 8 years in a row. It was only 3 years ago that ESPN broadcast its month-long love letter about the Leinart-Bush-White USC team being the best in all of college football history... right up until they got beat on the field by the Longhorns.
Over the past 10 years, no other school in the country has had an easier path to a BCS bowl than USC does because of the consistent mediocrity of the PAC 10. USC has no right to expect people to just ignore the results when USC loses focus and allows itself to drop clunker games like Oregon State or Stanford.
USC got handled by a team that wound up 9-4 and Florida lost to a team that wound up 9-4.
Texas lost on a last second play to a team that went 11-2.
Utah didn't lose at all.
Either of those two teams has as much or more reason to feel slighted this year than USC.
1-09-2009 @ 1:28PM
Guvnah said...
Here's another thing to consider...
The BCS and all of the computer formulas need to throw out of consideration any win that a FBS team has against an FCS team. And it should count any loss against an FCS team twice (a la Michigan v. Appy. St)
Among this year's BCS bowl teams, seven of them --- Oklahoma (Chattanooga), Florida (Citadel), Utah (Weber St.), Va. Tech (Furman), Ohio St. (Youngstown St.), Penn St. (Coastal Carolina), and Cincinatti (Eastern Kentucky) --- all fattened up on FCS teams.
Only Texas, USC and Alabama did not play an FCS opponent. So as far as I'm concerned, all of those other teams really have one fewer wins than their record shows.
Florida's case is particularly egregious, because they didn't schedule Citadel as a first or second week warm-up game... they played them in week 11... basically giving themselves a bye week.
1-09-2009 @ 10:39PM
Esther said...
And where are you basing your facts that USC could beat Florida? We both have a loss albeit we lost by a blocked kick and you lost by a touchdown. Florida was far more dominant in the SEC than USC was in the PAC 10. You played crappy games against Arizona whom you beat by only a touchdown and Cal--I know they were crappy because I saw them both. If you think the Florida Oklahoma game was crappy, that's because two great defenses came and disrupted the opposing offense's rhythm. That's what great defenses do...Who did USC play all year? Ohio State...Penn State? Woopty doo, you beat up on the big 10...sorry Florida's been there and done that. USC hasn't done anything special to warrant anyone telling me that USC could beat Florida. The truth is, on any given day, either team could win.
1-12-2009 @ 2:08PM
cHRIS said...
Utah 13- UNM (4-8)10. Call that a moral loss....
1-13-2009 @ 11:18PM
Chris said...
So USC is better because why??? Because their stats say so... OU's stats obviously didn't matter. Get your head out of you ass. I'm not a Gator fan or a Sooner fan. You need to realize that this is college football. Any team can beat you on any given day. USC was a 17 point favorite over OSU. They lost. Anything can happen. Until there is a playoff NO ONE will truely know. But don't tell one team they're not deserving. This is the system everyone agreed to follow at the begining of the season. Florida and Oklahoma worked the system and got the job done. USC had more than enough chances to blow up some scores against mid-lower level teams in the PAC 10 but failed to do so (ASU, AU, UCLA). Their resume just didn't look as good Florida or Oklahoma. Basically you're just a disgruntle fan that wants everything to go their way. Quit crying about it. Oh yeah... one more thing... tell me how USC is going to do next year when they have to replace up to 10 STARTERS on defenses alone!!! I believe Florida had to do that after they won the championship in 2006. They went 9-4 the next year. Good luck douche!!!!
1-09-2009 @ 3:10PM
Bryan said...
It is time for Bob Stoops to go. It is inexcusable to come into 5 BCS bowls so unprepared, so casually indifferent to the challenge, and to apparently have not even bothered over the Christmas break to do one ounce of preparation for the game. Did they even hold any practices between the Big 12 Championship a tonight's game? Evidently not. This loss was a failure of coaching, period.
He should be fired immediately. Hell, he should be fired that night at the stadium, locked out of the team hotel, and had to have to bought his own ticket home.
Several years of rebuilding would be preferable to several more years of someone who can always get you to the dance but @#$%s in his hat once he gets there.
Time to go.
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 1:16PM
Guvnah said...
Bryan:
the issue isn't that they're unprepared (although they are often that)... it's that they're overrated and shouldn't be there in the first place.
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 2:35PM
Greg M said...
Hey DM, where are you getting your facts from about USC? USC has 11 titles, Notre Dame has 11 and in some circles have 13, Alabama has 12, etc. Before you claim facts make sure they are facts first please.
Reply
1-10-2009 @ 1:41AM
Jim said...
Greg, where did you get these numbers? You had to pick a random starting point. You did not pick 1936 (the year of the first AP poll, which is generally the starting point) nor did you include all years (Yale would be the all-time leader with 18 national "titles").
Also, to further compound the confusion, there are other "titles" besides those of the AP poll and the UPI poll. Which ones do you include and exclude? For example, if you include ALL potential polls, Ohio State "won" six national titles in the eight-year period 1968-1975, a record unmatched by anyone ever unless you go back to the nineteenth century and consider (again) Yale.
1-09-2009 @ 2:15PM
Chris said...
What a tragic end to what could have been one of the best college football seasons ever! Just think of the emotion and money that could have been made by the NCAA. The BCS deserved what it got and the Big 12 deserved what it got. It sent the second best team in the Big 12 conference to play the best team in the SEC. Where is the logic? We as fans were cheated out of a meaningful end to a remarkable season. All the excuses of X beat Y and Y beat Z, but X lost to Z and therefore Y gets to play over X......HOW STUPID CAN THIS BE? Obviously there was an agenda. I can understand if 2 teams that did not play each other using the XYZ formula, but when you have a head to head? What an idiotic system the BCS is!
Oklahoma fans should be ashamed. You got handled by the team that deserved to be there. Florida would not and could not hold Texas' offense to 14 points!
Here's how the final standings read this year:
#1 (co-champions) TEXAS, FLORIDA
#3 UTAH (held to a 13-10 win against UNM (4-8) Mountain West Conf.)
#4 USC
#5 Oklahoma
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 10:39PM
Esther said...
Now let me get this straight, OSU nearly held Texas to 17 points (if not for last 1.5 mins heroics) and you're telling me that Florida could not hold you to 14? I'm sorry but I don't think I'd be stretching it if I say that Florida's defense easily eclipses OSU's. Not to mention, we both played Oklahoma (although that same Oklahoma team's defense and offense got much better after losing to you guys) and they scored 35 on you. Ole Miss scored 47 on Tech and held them to 34. Tech scored 39 on you guys and held you to 33. Even Ole Miss played Tech better than you. So I'd like you to explain to me why Florida could not hold you to 14? I'm not saying that Florida would hold you to 14, but I'd like for you to give me solid reasoning as to why Florida could not hold Texas to 14.
1-13-2009 @ 10:32PM
bluerange308 said...
Ole Miss beat you guys, so shut up trying to sound smart, because you're not.
1-09-2009 @ 4:54PM
Konawa said...
Get your facts straight. OU actually scored much less in the fourth quarter than most top 10 teams. Many times the starters were pulled by 2nd quarter. How many teams would like to have OU's history, titles, etc. I think most. Take out Harvin, like we lost Murray and what would you have had? Gaters deserve the gold, but it's always closer than it appears.
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 10:05PM
bigdog said...
you are right on==murray would have made a major difference-----not mentioned by the media---also home field is worth 6or 7points ,not mentioned
1-13-2009 @ 4:25PM
Duane said...
oklahoma ran 90 plays a game. most ran 65. Even when pulled early, Bradford and Co. had a full game worth of reps. Stoops is a genius at getting numbers and looking sportsmanlike.
1-09-2009 @ 10:52PM
Esther said...
And here is another thing to consider Guvnah...Florida played a conference championship game and USC did not. Florida also played one more game than USC, so even if you threw out the Citadel game, Florida and USC would still end up with the same record. So what's your point about Florida playing the Citadel? So next time you're out there considering, let's consider all the facts, shall we?
Reply