Saturday was a painful, agonizing experience for hapless Washington State. The Wazzu Cougars lost 69-0 to mighty USC, prompting analysts on other networks to make unflattering comments about Southern Cal head coach Pete Carroll. The insinuation from Tim Brando and Verne Lundquist, in particular, was that Pete Carroll felt the need to run up the score to earn a few style points for his team's BCS hopes.It was a total mismatch of teams. Washington State put up a meager 116 yards of offense to USC's 625. It could have been much worse. Had Pete Carroll been in a record-setting mood, I suspect the Trojans could have put up yardage in the four-digit range. Scary thought, huh?
But a very cursory examination reveals that despite the shutout, USC had no intention of embarrassing Wazzu any more than they were already embarrassing themselves.
But here are a few facts to consider before throwing Carroll under the bus. From the L.A. Times' Adam Rose:
-- Joe McKnight didn't suit up. Sure, he had turf toe, but he said earlier this week that he would have played if this game wasn't against Wazzu. He later took it back, but we all know better.Rose goes on to list 10 reasons total. But of final note is the play which undoubtedly got the attention of Lundquist and Brando. Facing 4th-and-5 in the fourth quarter, Carroll was faced with a difficult decision. Should he kick the field goal, and thereby "run up the score"? Should he kneel on the ball and possibly insult his opponent that way as well? Or should he just half-heartedly run the ball and hope the other team could stop him on downs? Carroll chose door No. 3 and was 'rewarded' with a conversion followed by a touchdown. Carroll's expression on the sideline said it all. He wasn't thrilled to score another touchdown.
-- With the ball in the red zone, USC ran out the clock to end the half. The first half.
-- Starting quarterback Mark Sanchez stopped throwing the ball with 32 minutes left in the game (translation: first half). He was left in for the first series of the second half, evidently to practice his handoffs and didn't even throw on 3rd-and-19. His day ended three minutes after the second half kickoff.
-- Mitch Mustain, USC's No. 2 quarterback, was only allowed to throw the ball once. It was the only passing attempt of the second half.
What we have here is your old-fashioned butt-kicking. And despite every possible effort to keep the game from getting out of hand, at some point the Cougs needed to step up and stop the Trojans' third-stringers and walk-ons from scoring. That is their obligation as an FBS team, a group of boys and men who made the conscious decision to play big boy football. They couldn't do it, and voila, 69-0. Pete Carroll should have no difficulty sleeping after this one.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-19-2008 @ 1:36PM
Clay said...
I'm no USC fan, but what are they supposed to do in that situation? They played everyone on the sideline and didn't throw any passes in the 2nd half! Here's an idea, if you don't want a team to run up the score then STOP THEM! Wash. St. is a D1 school in the PAC-10 for crying out loud.
Reply
10-19-2008 @ 1:19PM
zoomer said...
i am a little upset with sc. i had to give 70 points to get a little action. why did they rap up so soon? they could have set a modern day scoring record. what is the deal with washington? are their academic standards so high that all their athletes must be able to read?
Reply
10-19-2008 @ 2:36PM
Jim Brigham said...
I am a life long UCLA fan and attended both UCLA and WSU. Needless to say I don't like USC. However, in no way was USC guilty of running up the score on WSU. They did everything they could to keep things under control short of really doing things that could easily be considered embarrassing, i.e. kneeling down, punting on 1st down, etc. WSU was ineffective in all aspects of the game and I hope they will improve as the years go by.
Reply
10-19-2008 @ 6:17PM
jeff smith said...
what is carrol supposed to do tell his third string players to not try.they want to show that they can play and maybe get more minutes..why is it ok for an sec team to scorealot of points on division 2 teams
Reply
10-20-2008 @ 1:01PM
OSU Alum '96 said...
Some WSU faithful have whined 3 weeks in a row now, saying Oregon, Oregon State and now USC have run up the score. Apparently WSU would like the 3rd and 4th stringers to come into the game in the 2nd half and just take a knee. That's equivalent to asking schools to lower their play, down to WSU's level. How are the third stringers ever going to get better, if they don't go on the field to PLAY. Practice reps are one thing, but game reps are very different. WSU needs to acknowledge they have a poor team, take their lumps and work on improving.
Reply
10-20-2008 @ 1:04PM
HUSKERDIVA said...
Does it really matter? WSU has had its share of problems this season. Whether Pete ran up the score or not is of no consequence, he won't be in the championship game. Period. End of story. The Big 12 and the SEC are what it's all about this year. They had a big game, good for them.
Reply
10-27-2008 @ 6:06PM
Dave said...
Hahahaha sure HUSKER...nice team you have there in Nebraska, what a powerhouse! Joke of a team. We will see who is in the title game at the end of the year genius.
10-20-2008 @ 3:15PM
Walkaway11 said...
Guess I could never make a football coach. No way I would tell bench warmers who give it all everyday and finally get into a game to not run the offense or try not to stop them on defense. What other sport says stop trying. Not baseball, not basketball etc. No, you do not have to throw bombs on every play, but for goodness sake, let them play it out.
Reply
10-20-2008 @ 5:20PM
Ron Zaz said...
Pete Carroll is in a class by himself!! Super classy!! Is there really ateam out there this good???True...they had there lousy game of the year. Now who would want to face them in a BCS Bowl????!!!
Reply
10-20-2008 @ 5:51PM
Robert said...
I watched the game and - are you kidding me? - if they wanted to run up points it would have been over 100. 4 quarterbacks played. Pete didn't let them pass in the second half. They only really ran one play in the second half: zone read run, over and over again. SC is one of only 5 teams that have never played a non - BCS opponent. Their body of work speaks for itself. And if, occasionally, they screw up and lose to a PAC-10 team, well, they don't lose to anyone else. Well, once to Texas by 3 points.
Reply
10-20-2008 @ 10:15PM
badgolfbob said...
Of course, Carroll ran-up the score! What other process would you suggest he use to advance in the polls while playing such a cupcake schedule? The human pollsters love Pete and, being a bright guy, Pete’s using that love to his advantage. Until there’s a playoff, that’s the game boys, and Pete’s a player.
Further… What’s Pete supposed to tell his third string when he doesn’t want them to score? How about, “Don’t score.”
Pete’s the Bobby Bowden of the new millennia!
Reply
10-21-2008 @ 5:44AM
larryrice said...
This game is supposed to be fun for the kids. It certainly does not sound fun for the pundits trying to spin what they think they saw. I like good football. Hooray for USC, Texas, Oklahoma, Penn Sate, Ohio State, LSU, Florida, and the other powerhouses with all those tremendous athletes. Three cheers for the honest programs that are representative and have scholar athletes: Penn State again, Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, Duke, Tulane, Rice, Stanford, UCLA and all the many others that I missed. Imagine this great entertainment, free on televison. I am to the point where I have dropped a "partisan" approach to sports and can cheer on excellence no matter from where it is packaged.
Reply
10-21-2008 @ 11:38AM
Rocko said...
Come on, cheaten pete wouldn't run a score! He's got too much class. NOT. Don't ever forget the reggie bush affair and just how deep cheaten pete was in it. No cooperation from either party for the NCAA. Why should they? NCAA is scared to death of USuC (must be too many alumns on staff, ; ) Cheat on!
Reply
10-21-2008 @ 12:34PM
EyeH8 said...
I must admit that the score reminded me of the scores my son and his buddies do on PS3. I'm no USC fan but Wazzu is so bad that I could round up 10 other guys from the park district and give them a decent game even though the guys and I would be playing ironman football. It's just the nature of schools like USC stockpiling talent where sometimes even their 3rd stringers and walkons are so much more talented than many other teams starters. I expect for Wazzu's coach and staff to be fired very soon. I wonder if Ryan Leaf has any eligibility left. They're an embarrassment to Division 1 football.
Reply
10-21-2008 @ 1:17PM
Greg said...
ANYONE who watched that game (myself included) could tell they DID NOT run up the score. See previous postings for THE FACTS regarding how SC played that game.
BTW, USC is one of FOUR Pac-10 teams to NEVER play a Div I-AA team and the other is Texas A&M. Go to the Big-10, Big-12 and especially the SEC for the "Cupcake schedule syndrome!"
Reply
10-21-2008 @ 4:50PM
Greg said...
Like wow man, any coach will look good, when his program is buying the best available players every year, just Reggie.
Reply
10-23-2008 @ 1:44PM
Rick said...
USC has not played anyone good to be in the top 10
Reply
10-24-2008 @ 9:48AM
john robinson said...
Greg
Texas A&M played the Citadel 3 years ago I beleive, I know they are 1-AA. So lets try another theory.
Reply