Look, I'm not the one saying Charlie Weis is underpaid. It's the fine folks over at Coaches Hot Seat who claim that the best-paid coach in college football isn't making enough. Notre Dame's head coach makes $4.2 million a year, but Coaches Hot Seat says he ought to be paid $5.25 million.Where do they get off saying this stuff? They didn't just pull that number out of thin air. Coaches Hot Seat figures that a coach should be paid 7.5% of his school's football revenue. Why 7.5%? I don't know, but they claim that the average coach takes in 7.61% of the team's football revenue, so their numbers seem reasonable. Still, take all this with a grain of salt.
Weis is getting shafted by more than a million bucks a year, so is he the most underpaid coach in college football? Nope. Not even close. The school getting the biggest bargain, as measured in sheer dollars, is Georgia. Few can argue with Mark Richt's record as the head Bulldog and, at $2.2 million a year, he probably doesn't remember what ramen noodles taste like. CHS says he ought to be getting just under $5 million. Mack Brown? Underpaid. Jim Tressel? Ditto.
The list of underpaid coaches doesn't stop there.
Complaining about Kirk Ferentz's salary is threatening to become a national pastime. Guess what? CHS says he's underpaid. Iowa has the tenth highest revenues of any college football team, and Ferentz's share of that should be $3.75 million, quite a bit more than the $3.03 million he makes.
Just making the tour of coaches who are the subject of fire[INSERT NAME HERE].com sites, Ty Willingham is underpaid. Tommy Tuberville is underpaid. Tommy Bowden was underpaid. So who's overpaid?
June Jones at SMU is the most overpaid coach in America, they claim. His $2 million salary is quite a bit bigger than the $750,000 they say he should be getting. But please, a little perspective. Of the ten most overpaid coaches (according to CHS) only three are in BCS conferences: David Cutcliffe, Bob Stoops and Pete Carroll. Good luck finding any Duke, OU, or USC fans who think their coach is overpaid.
Then again, sheer dollars alone might not be the best measure of overpaid/underpaid. The coach who takes home the greatest percentage of his school's revenue is New Mexico State's Hal Mumme. About one out of every four dollars NMSU takes in from its football program goes directly to Mumme. Of course, Mumme's salary is $349,000 a year. That's $1,000 less than Charlie Weis makes for one game.
There are plenty of proven coaches who get a too-small slice of the revenue pie. Mark Richt gets 3.33% of Georgia's revenues. Joe Paterno gets 3%. Mike Riley has had an acceptable run at Oregon State, but only gets 2.77% of the Beavers' bucks. Mark Dantonio (pictured right) gets a dismal 2.56% from Michigan State. No word on whether he has to work a half-day on Christmas and bring his own coal for the furnace. He'll get a big raise in the off-season, I'm sure.But who is the coach who's getting the worst deal? You'll find him at Miami of Ohio, a school which openly refers to itself as The Cradle of Coaches. Some of the biggest names in coaching history got their start at Miami, coaches with names like Hayes, Parseghian, and Schembechler, all of whom went on to great success at other schools.
If those giants were paid like the current RedHawks coach, Shane Montgomery, it's not too hard to figure out why they left. Montgomery makes the least of any Division 1-A Football Bowl Subdivision coach by any measure. His salary of $144,000 a year is the lowest in the FBS and represents just 2.4% of Miami's income from football. There are more than a few 1-AA coaches who make more than that. Every assistant coach on the Florida Gators staff makes more money than that. Even if RedHawks fans aren't totally pleased with Coach Montgomery (and they're not), they ought to be ashamed that their university pays him so little.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-14-2008 @ 8:51AM
steve said...
MONEY...MONEY...MONEY...Just like the clowns
on WALL STREET.
What happened to EDUCATION?
As for Charlie...ND has the Number One recruiting
opportunities in the nation...and still NO Championship
or big bowl wins under Charlie!
Not to mention the $$$ spent on tutors, steaks and
cars?
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 9:58AM
Pete Holiday said...
...why is the Athletic department supposed to be funding education? None of the schools that are pulling in $30m+ a year are taking money away from education.
10-14-2008 @ 10:00AM
Pete Holiday said...
Mark, you wrote an entire piece on salaries in the NCAA and failed to even mention Nick Saban. This, as you know, is completely against college football blogging regulations, in which it is mandated that all talk of salaries include references to Ferentz and $aban.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 10:07AM
Mark Hasty said...
For what it's worth, Pete, they claim Saban is underpaid too. He "should" be making $750,000 a year more than he does.
10-14-2008 @ 10:09AM
Pete Holiday said...
They must not have gotten the memo that $aban is OMGWTFOVERPAIDLOL.
10-14-2008 @ 11:41AM
Ddub said...
Er, if just about EVERYONE is underpaid according to their analysis, can't we safely assume it's the 7.5% that is incorrect? I mean, I could say the sky should be red, but if everyone else tells me it's blue, chances are I'm the wrong one.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 11:57AM
Mark Hasty said...
The 7.5% figure is the number I had trouble with as well, Ddub. That's the average percentage of revenues coaches receive, but obviously there's more room to go over that percentage than to go under it. Small schools have to over that percentage (sometimes WAY over) to attract a decent coach.
For example, New Mexico State had to "overpay" for Hal Mumme. They have the lowest annual football revenues of any 1-A school ($1.5 million, about what Notre Dame and Texas make in one quarter of football). 7.5% of that is $112,500, which would put the NMSU job in the "why bother?" category for even a fair-to-middling coach like Hal Mumme.
The median percentage is far more useful in determining who is overpaid and who is underpaid. That would fall between coach #60 by percentages (Steve Kragthorpe, 6.17%) and coach #61 (Kirk Ferentz, 6.06%). Of course, even by THAT standard, Charlie Weis is underpaid. He's at #63 with a flat 6%. But at least that puts Nick Saban on the "overpaid" end of the scale (#57, 6.25%).
10-14-2008 @ 2:12PM
Bobby Dodd said...
I say fat Charlie should start with baby steps, you know, just beat a ranked team or a team with a winning record before he goes for that big raise.
At this point, I would say HE owes Notre Dame money!
Reply
11-02-2008 @ 5:35PM
Bobby Dodd said...
Haw! Haw! Haw!
Oh, I hate being right. What happened against Pitt???
Oh yeah, they have a winning record, that's what.
NOTRE DAME SUCKS.
10-14-2008 @ 6:12PM
Steve Sobasky said...
Let's put the whole ranking thing into perspective! USC loses to an unranked team ,(with a losing record),they are from one of the weakest conferences nationwide.Florida loses to an unranked team,(from the strongest conference nationwide).UGA loses to the 2nd ranked team in the nation, yet both USC and Florida are ranked above UGA! After the USC loss, they drop 8 spots, UGA drops 10 spots! Why do the writers not pick up on this? In 8 weeks it will be clear, UGA will be the best team in the country!!
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 6:24PM
Mark Hasty said...
Polls are for doofuses, IMO. If it weren't for the BCS, which is one of the worst things to happen to college football, nobody would get worked up about which one-loss team was ranked where. They would only care about how their teams were doing in their conferences. We were much better off when everyone agreed that all national championships in 1-A were mythical.
10-17-2008 @ 8:13AM
Steve said...
Charlie the cheater is lucky to be getting paid. His "offensive genius" reputation was made by stealing defensive signals while coaching at New England. The NFL swept it under the rug to "move on" and not tarnish its reputation. Charlie has "no comment". And Notre Dame has its head in the sand. Very uncomplicated for all. And very sad.
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 11:45PM
Bobby Dodd said...
Another great week for Charlie!
Another beat down by another team with a winning record!
Navy and Syracuse coming up!
Now THAT'S a power schedule~!
NOTRE DAME SUCKS!!!!!!
Reply