In the world of college football coaches, Greg Schiano's name continues to be one of the hottest. He has been pursued for the Miami and Michigan jobs. He is at the forefront of every speculative story on "who will be the next coach at Penn State when A salary boost that could pay up to $2 million with bonuses? Check. More money for his assistant coaches? Check. Free and unlimited use of a helicopter and jet for
In the addendum to his contract, dated July 2, 2007, the university arranged for Nelligan Sports Marketing, the exclusive marketing agent for Rutgers, to pay the coach the additional $250,000 -- keeping the payments off the school's payroll.Rutgers Athletic Director Robert Mulcahy considered this being "a little resourceful" in coming up with extra money to pay Schiano. Not that they were trying to keep it off the books or anything.
The money was deducted from sponsorship revenues collected on the university's behalf by the marketing firm, but the amount was guaranteed by Rutgers. It was listed as a payment for "personal services" and was made to a limited liability company established by Schiano.
Sure looks like it, though. The athletic department is getting less money from the marketing firm. Shifting that money to Schiano's LLC. The only difference is that the athletic department is directly paying Schiano that money. Cutting out the middleman?
It also turns out that Schiano had a "Jeff Tedford clause" in the contract.
Rutgers University made a secret deal allowing the head football coach to walk away from his contract without penalty if it did not complete a major expansion of its football stadium by 2009.Rutgers school president has apologized over the "lack of transparency" to Schiano's contract and now has regrets over the way it was handled.
Under his current agreement, Greg Schiano is required to pay $500,000 for breaking his 10-year contract if he leaves following the 2009 football season. However, an addendum to that contract, never divulged by Rutgers, releases him from those same damages if the construction is not completed on time.
Considering Rutgers is a state school and facing budget issues as the whole state of New Jersey is in a budget crisis, this information is a bit embarrassing to the school and a potential annoyance. Especially since it, unsurprisingly, has resulted in politicians calling for investigations into the matter.
It does, however, explain why the athletic department was so gung-ho about getting the stadium expansion underway, even in the face of a money crunch. And why they are pushing forward as the potential to go significantly over budget looms.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-23-2008 @ 7:06AM
George B Vieto said...
Rutgers University will do anything to keep their best football coach in New Jersey so that he doesn't leave for a higher paying job somewhere else.
Reply
7-23-2008 @ 9:40AM
D said...
As far as I can tell, most PSU folks I know still expect Schiano to bolt for PSU when the job opens. But supposedly JoePa has been telling PSU recruits that his successor will be from within the program (presumably, Bradley). What gives?
Reply
7-24-2008 @ 10:13PM
notanothertennisfan said...
Schiano's contract with Rutgers isn't so very different than what other coaches have - many schools set up contracts for their coaches for extra pay. Not everything was so "secret" - Schiano's contract is pretty clear:
http://www.coacheshotseat.com/RutgersCoachesHotSeat.pdf
Maybe the writer who reported the story initially is new to the Division I athletics sports beat...
Reply