The Pitt Panthers have long been innovators in the fight to do more with less. First, there was the notion to begin referring to the team as "Pitt," even though we know that "sburgh" is still there, don't pretend it isn't. Then there's Dave Wannstedt covering his upper lip with 80% of a moustache on a routine basis. Now, their passing game will be ever more efficient and wondrous, all thanks to one player's casual attitude toward academics:
Pitt receiver Maurice Williams will sit out the season after being declared academically ineligible.Williams was expected to start after a productive true freshman season; instead, he will redshirt. This (go Iowa) is probably good news (I root for Iowa) to teams facing the Panthers this season (HAHAHAHA SUCK IT WANNSTACHE GO HAWKS WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO).
"We believe Maurice can achieve a lot at Pitt, both academically and athletically, and our expectations are for him to use this as motivation for improvement," Panthers coach Dave Wannstedt said in a statement.
(WE'RE GOING TO TOTALLY OWN YOU ON SEPTEMBER 20 BRING IT SUCKAS)




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-08-2008 @ 7:55PM
Ryan Ferguson said...
I love that picture.
Reply
6-10-2008 @ 9:57AM
ChrisA said...
If Iowa is worried about getting burned by Mo Williams they have got a long way to go this summer.
Reply
6-13-2008 @ 11:49AM
JoePa's Diaper said...
Lame, Adam. Just lame.
Iowa may indeed beat Pitt but it won't be because Pitt lost it's #4 WR (behind - in order - Derek Kinder, Oderick Turner, and TJ Porter) due to academic troubles.
BTW, who the hell are the Hawks? Atlanta's NBA team? What do they have to do with this?
Oh, do you mean the Hawkeyes? As in Iowa Hawkeyes? Why would you call them the Hawks when everyone knows that they're the Hawkeyes? That couldn't be a century old nickname for the local team could it?
Hmm...
Reply
6-19-2008 @ 2:36AM
Herm said...
JoePa's Diaper is right..lame..
he probably woulda been 5th WR though when you include Baldwin..and 7th throwing threat when you include TEs Byham and Dickerson
Reply