
Why did the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission reject USC's offer on Wednesday to conditionally accept an agreement to allow the Trojans to play in the Coliseum?
When we first heard of USC's "put up or shut up proposal," we thought it was brilliant, because to reject the plan would require that the Coliseum Commission admit that not even its members had faith in their ability to deliver on their promises to the University.
Many observers say that the Coliseum Commission is reluctant to hand over the keys to the building to the University.
"It's not only about money," Coliseum General Manager Pat Lynch told the LA Times. "It's about everything."
Does "everything" include a plan to bring the Minnesota Vikings to Los Angeles?
I got a phone call from an anonymous source at a restricted number on Tuesday morning that was too revealing not to follow up on....
Here is what we were told by this alleged "City Hall Insider"... Our tipster heard from a source in Sacramento that Commission President Bernard Parks was at a Holiday Party and was overheard bragging that he and his colleagues have been talking to an NFL developer--not the league or any owners directly--about trying to lure the Minnesota Vikings to the L.A. Coliseum. These talks have been going on for at least three months, including meetings since USC's threat to move to the Rose Bowl went public, and that the entire Commission, not just Parks, had been involved to some degree with the talks.
Wowsers. If true, that would be big news, both in Los Angeles--because it would show that the Coliseum Commission has not been negotiating in good faith with USC--but in Minnesota, where the Vikings were recently told by State Officials not to expect any action on getting a new stadium in the next year.
Normally, an anonymous tipster would not be enough to run with a story, but then again, without anonymous tipsters, there would never have been a President Gerald Ford, so we decided to explore the issue further.
Unfortunately, the shadowy Coliseum Commission does not publish its agendas online--doing the minimum required under California's Brown Act to let people know about their meetings, what they're discussion and with whom. A call to Commission President Park's office on Tuesday could not confirm that there would even be a Coliseum Commission meeting that very afternoon, despite the fact that the meeting had been widely publicized in the media.
One person told us that in order to get back agendas or to research Commissioner Park's official travel records we'd probably have to file a public records request--which could take weeks.
We contacted Bernard Parks' City Council office Wednesday but his press secretary, Bernard Parks, Jr., was on vacation until January. The charge d'affaires for communications told us that she could only repeat statements made by the Councilman in public to respond to our questions and offered an interview with Parks, Sr. himself. However, once FanHouse explained what we wanted to discuss, Parks never returned our request for an interview.
So, here is what we know...
Commission President Bernard Parks really truly believes that the NFL will come one day to the Coliseum, enough so that he goes to every NFL owners meeting that he can. Parks has also been identified as one of the biggest obstacles to inking a deal between USC and the Coliseum.
There was indeed a Christmas Party this weekend, hosted by political consulting firm Cerrell Associates to which Parks would have been invited and would have been around plenty of Sacramento insiders. Party host Joe Cerrell is a "Committee"-level donor to USC, meaning he gives more than $7500, and holds one of the best open-bar Christmas Parties on the L.A. political circuit. I did not attend, however, because I was in San Francisco speaking at a convention.
Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's office had never heard of such a conversation, but would not rule it out. They also tell FanHouse that if the NFL were to come to Los Angeles, neither the Vikings nor the Coliseum are under consideration in their mind.
Meanwhile in Minnesota, Vikings owner Zygi Wilf has publicly stated that the stadium issue, "needs to be resolved in the near future." This is despite the fact that the team's contract to play in the Metrodome goes through 2011.
FanHouse's Vikings blogger JJ Cooper, when asked about the rumor responds, "It all adds up from what I understand. The Vikes just tried to get their stadium deal through the legislature and were told they aren't a priority in '08. So unless something changes, they are looking at least at 2009 to get some kind of funding for a new stadium, which means we're probably talking 2013 before a new stadium could be ready. Their lease is up in 2011, so they will be a free agent with no sign of a stadium deal to come. At the same time the Vikes have pretty much sold out the Metrodome for years, so it may be crazy to pick up and head to the land of guaranteed blackouts. But there has been speculation in Minnesota that they could leave."
So, is the L.A. Coliseum Commission secretly trying to being the Vikings to L.A. and stalling talks with USC as a result?
If we were to rate this on a Mythbusters scale, it would have to be labeled: PLAUSIBLE.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-20-2007 @ 8:30PM
Mrtravlear said...
Plausible? How about delusional is closer to the truth.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 3:52PM
tom stovall said...
Scott,
Do you mean to tell me with all that 'sc alumni $, they can't build a state-of-the-art "trojan stadium" somewhere? Gimme a break! I suppose though its easier to feed off the public trough than do it yourself. What a joke!
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 4:01PM
leo G said...
LA would then have 2 teams from Minnesota with funny names for Southern California.............the Lakers and Vikings
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 4:39PM
Scott Olin Schmidt said...
Sure USC could build a stadium, but where?
As far as the Vikes actually coming to L.A., that's delusional. Whether Parks thinks he can make it happen? Plausible indeed.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 5:02PM
bennyprince said...
Los Angeles Vikings doesn't sound as good as Los Angeles Jaguars... but whatever.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 6:08PM
`V.L. Levitt said...
A beter idea is: let's send Parks to Minnesota.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 10:00PM
TJ said...
How in the hell did Parks ever become president of the Commission, unbelieveable. He was incompetent as the Chief of Police.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 10:46PM
John said...
This is hilarious. I love blog posts based on eighth-hand information. Or was it ninth? And what the hell is an "NFL developer" anyway?
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 3:42AM
Herbert O. Crisler said...
It's strange to think that USC is (was?) a dominant college football program, but unlike the other large programs it doesn't even know if it will play "at home" in the future. While some other programs are approaching 100 years in their stadiums, USC is left to wander around LA looking for "home"?
Reply
12-23-2007 @ 3:04AM
bill winters said...
Say it ain't so.The vikings belong where they are. Cold weather,should be outside again,among the nordic people.Don't repeat the same story as the lakers mistake. Also the rams belong in L.A.Go Vikings!A.P.keep rolling! Bill w.
Reply
12-23-2007 @ 10:14PM
Bob said...
Bernard Parks? LA again deserves to lose USC at the Coliseum. Parks single handedly screwed LAPD over as the Chief of Police. But in all do respect, LA Coliseum Commsision lost the Rams, Raiders, & UCLA. Now it stands to lose USC football. Now what? How long has it been since LA had a NFL team? Isn't the Coliseum an issue because the place is old? Good luck with Bernard Parks in charge. It won't surprise me one bit when USC says, "See ya!"
Reply
12-25-2007 @ 3:13PM
atl#1 said...
Instead of sending the Vikings packing to LA how about going after the woeful Falcons?? While I would hate to lose a team that I have supported for over 40 years, it may be time for them to go given the mess that Arthur Blank has wrought on the city and the team!!
Reply