They aren't the dregs but nor are they real threats to win the league. They could lose to Iowa State or a MAC team and I will watch their crappy December bowl games pulling for them to win just so everyone can finally shut up about how much the Big Ten suxxxx; I will usually be disappointed about the outcomes of these games. Ladies and gentlemen: the mediocre of the Big Ten. A veritable cornucopia of the average. A smörgåsbord of the typical. A vast array of another noun used to denote something sort of good and sort of bad. THRILL to the sartorial stylings of Illinois linebackers
BOGGLE at just how Joe Tiller hasn't yanked his starting quarterback over and over the past few years
WONDER what is up with Iowa, anyway? Shouldn't they be better?
All of this... and more! After the jump.
| Iowa Hawkeyes |
Last year: 6-7 overall, 2-6 Big TenWHY THEY'LL WIN: There was a single year in which Notre Dame was being driven into the ground by Ty Willingham, Illinois was still pre-Zook, and Chicago was laden with a veritable smorgasbord of talent, all of which Tom Lemming overrated badly. This year those kids are juniors and redshirt sophomores. Also, there's talent at the skill positions with true sophomore Dominque Douglas, and the next Inexplicably Good White Iowa Receiver Andy Brodell, verteran, slashing tailback Albert Young (right), and a line full of the very highly touted. On defense, they have a pair of standout defensive ends in Kenny Iwebema -- now being touted as a potential first-round pick in some circles -- and the underrated Brian Mattison. WHY THEY WON'T: There's help coming in the secondary in the form of Jordan Bernstine and loopy Detroit product Cedric Everson, who claimed offers from six billion schools and committed to a dozen of them before finally settling on the Hawkeyes right before signing day, but it still looks very grim unless the freshmen light the world on fire. There is also the matter of replacing Drew Tate, though that's less of a big deal than it might have been if Tate had lived up to the expectations heaped upon his senior year; he did not. Jake Christensen, a member of that heralded recruiting class, will take the reigns. There should be a requisite amount of new starter moments. PROGNOSIS: Who knows? The last couple years of the Tate era were unexpected disappointments after Kirk Ferentz became everyone's it coach by leading the Hawkeyes to back-to-back-to-back final rankings of #8. If Christensen can match Tate's production, or even vaguely approach it, a major leap forward in the standings is absolutely going to happen as Iowa takes up Purdue's mantle as the Big Ten scheduler's favorite son: no Ohio State, no Michigan. With no non-conference opponent looking dangerous (NIU, Syracuse, Iowa State, WMU) Iowa could be on its way to 9-3 or even 10-2, hollow though that record may be. |
| Illinois Fighting Illini |
Last year: 2-10 overall, 1-7 Big TenWHY THEY'LL WIN: Jesus, did we really put these guys in "the mediocre"? I guess so. Well, there is the matter of returning 19 starters from a team that went from a traveling bye week to, like, a tough traveling bye week. Middle linebacker J Leman is awesome for many reasons:
WHY THEY WON'T: Their starting quarterback completed 37% of his passes! Thirty seven! Percent! Of his passes! !!! Even if he improves radically, vastly, more than any other quarterback in D-I this fall, he will still suck. It would take a truly epic leap to reach competence. And it's possible that the Illinois defense was overrated by the numbers. Maybe their yardage totals are low not because they were good but just because teams faced with starting at the 50 all the time were forced to stop by that endzone thing? And for all the hype associated with the last couple of recruiting classes, all the hyped recruits save tailback Rashard Mendenhall are still underclassmen. PROGNOSIS: The internet is filled with reflexive Zook bashing after his Florida teams lost a few games in spectacular fashion, but the guy can put together a fierce defense out of old sticks of gum, empty egg cartons, and Joe Dirt, middle linebacker. I assume Williams will get up to, like, a 50% completion rate. I assume that having a team that returns 19 starters is good, especially when a lot of them are three year starters. I think Mendenhall is pretty dang good. So... it's bowling for the Illini, somewhere in the 6-6 to 8-4 range. |
| Purdue Boilermakers |
Last year: 8-6 overall, 5-3 Big TenWHY THEY'LL WIN: Curtis Painter is a senior quarterback with multiple years of starting under his belt and the array of weapons at his disposal is frightening. Dorien Bryant, this year's Brooks Bollinger Memorial Eighth Year Senior Award winner, returns after reeling in 87 catches for 1038 yards last year. Greg Orton, Selwyn Lymon, and tight end Dustin Keller round out the deepest and most frequently used receiving corps in the Big Ten. Kory Sheets and Jaycen Taylor are an impressive 1-2 punch at running back. Jordan Grimes is a potential All-American at guard. Oh, and they return a lot of starters on defense. WHY THEY WON'T: 5-3 in the Big Ten looks impressive, but guess who's back on the schedule? Michigan and Ohio State. Purdue is fortunate to see Wisconsin and Illinois rotate off instead of, like, Minnesota and Michigan State, but that's still a way to seriously harsh your buzz. And about those defensive starters: they suck hard. Miraculous defensive end Anthony Spencer is about the only guy who departed, but he was also the only guy to do anything good on the nation's fifth-worst defense. Also, though Curtis Painter is the Big Ten's second most-experienced quarterback behind Chad Henne, he's not very good. Despite having the above-cataloged panoply of weapons at his disposal, Purdue finished but 46th in passer efficiency without having to face two of the league's four really good defenses; the nonconference was also full of totally lame pass defenses. There's no excuse for that level of mediocrity when you're in the Tiller system. Painter is a spray passer who almost single-handedly lost Purdue its bowl game; Drew Brees he ain't. PROGNOSIS: Purdue might actually be rocking one of the tougher nonconference schedules in the conference even if it has a I-AA team and two MAC snacks on it. This is a depressing acknowledgment of the current state of college football scheduling, yes, but also a nod to the non-crappiness at the top of the MAC. Taking on Toledo and Central Michigan isn't a walk for anyone outside of Michigan and Ohio State these days; there is also the annual showdown with the Irish. They should go 3-1, but 4-0 or 2-2 OOC is possible. Then wicked, tricksy Big Ten schedulers deliver a double oomph of revenge for missing the Big Two the past couple years: Purdue's Rose Bowl run figures to be over before it starts as Ohio State and Michigan kick off the Big Ten schedule. Yikes. The defense should be less clueless; Painter should be marginally better; this is still going to be a pretty meh team, but one that goes 8-4 in the regular season and wins a bowl game. Maybe? |
Last year: 6-7 overall, 2-6 Big Ten
Last year: 2-10 overall, 1-7 Big Ten
Last year: 8-6 overall, 5-3 Big Ten



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-02-2007 @ 5:20PM
Matthew.Noll said...
Purdue will go 9-3. Painter isn't as bad as you say. Last year was his first year as the starter for a team with no defense and no kicker. He had to force things to keep Purdue in the game. I wouldn't expect him to be at Drew Brees' level of performance after his sophomore year. He will turn out to be a good QB by the time his career is done.
Reply
8-02-2007 @ 5:20PM
Matthew.Noll said...
Painter broke Brees' record for passing yards in a season.
Brees threw more picks in his sophomore season than Painter.
Reply
8-02-2007 @ 6:10PM
SportSnipe.com said...
I think Purdue will be a solid football team this year and underdog to compete for the title. If Painter can make some strides this year, watch out!
http://www.sportsnipe.com/ncaa_football
Reply
8-03-2007 @ 5:07PM
Jeff G said...
I think its a safe bet to say all teams not named Michigan are underdogs to win the Big Ten title yes/no?
Also, J (Jay?) Leman is my new favorite Big Ten athlete now that Tim Doyle has left us.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 7:35PM
Mike said...
Juice Williams was plagued by terrible receiving last year, not to mention running for his life half the time. Illinois receivers dropped 46 passes last season. That's criminal, but Arrelious Benn- and superathletic TE Jeff Cumberland having a full year under his belt- should change that. I don't know if Juice will ever be pinpoint accurate, but he showed tremendously improved touch in the spring game, and he did average nearly 15 yards per completion last season despite the 39.5% (not 37%) completion rate.
Given that he was a true freshman in the Big Ten playing for a bad offense, I don't know how much more one could've expected Juice to have done last year. Remember what Troy Smith, Vince Young and Matt Leinart did as true freshmen? Of course not, because they all redshirted, like most QBs do (granted, last year's blue-chip freshmen QBs- Tebow, Mustain, Stafford, Juice- all played, most of them extensively, but that isn't the norm).
I don't think sucking is in Juice's future, especially not with Arrelious Benn around (I find it as hard to believe he's a freshman than I did Greg Oden).
As for the Illini going somewhere between 6-6 and 8-4....8 wins is a stretch. I'll be thrilled with 6 wins, then beware in '08.
Reply
8-07-2007 @ 9:05PM
mark Eminhizer said...
Check your facts before writting an article.
# 1 Painter is a red-shirt Junior
# 2 Purdue opens the big ten season against Minnesota
Reply
8-18-2007 @ 5:11PM
Big Roy said...
Illinos outpayed Ohio State, Penn State and Wisconsin last year and still lost all three with some pathetic mistakes and bad plays. There is talent here. It all comes down to Zook. If he dosen't win 7 games and break even in conference this year he is never going to. Mendenhall should be an A-A. He would be with any other coach.
But Iowa is certainly a contender. They outplayed Texas and should have beaten them. Iowa had more talent on the field, which would sure shock the recruiting experts. They lost some OLs but they still have some good ones. But I think the Hawks are going to be better at QB this year and if Young is healthy--watch out.
Reply
8-27-2007 @ 1:43AM
Badger said...
anyone who picks michigan to win the big ten, think twice. they will have no defense, having lost 8 starters. defense wins championships. wisconsin has a solid defense anchored by a strong defensive line and shutdown corners. add in an very good offensive line (which is underrated) all of the receiving corps returning, p.j. hill dropping 20 pounds in the offseason, making him a good deal faster, and just as strong. tyler donovan is a solid qb that has proven he can play at the division 1 level. add in punter ken debauche and place kicker taylor melhaff and you have an elite football team. coming off of a 12-1 season, winning their last 8 games and climbing the polls from preseason #36 to #6, look for wisconsin to run the table and compete in the national championship game.
Reply